Showing posts with label Amr Moussa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amr Moussa. Show all posts

Wednesday, 1 November 2017

What Amr Moussa wrote “3”: the greenhouse




If it wasn’t for the promise I gave to the readers to make this article the last about Mr. Amr Moussa’s memoir, I would have written ten or may be more articles about it, for the memoir is really rich in what is worth mentioning and commenting over, either in agreement or disagreement. In addition to the necessity to tackle what was written about it, either the constructive or destructive criticism.

In the beginning, I have a question to ask that some may think is essential: when should we put limits between the subjective opinion and the objective one?... should we tackle issues that seem personal and relate to the upbringing and social composition or not? I believe the answer is not easy, for as long as the text being discussed contains what is closely related to the personal side, it is likely to discuss what came in the text, since it is known that the upbringing, social composition along with the cultural composition are crucial factors directly and strongly influencing man’s character, behavior, choices, decisions and ambitions.

Here, I believe what Mr. Moussa wrote about his upbringing, family, social composition and life path until he graduated from university is the main key to understand his character, behavior and ambitions, as the man was haunted by “as-Saraya[1]” and its surrounding environment, perhaps until this moment as he’s now in his eighties, may he enjoy long healthy life.

The heir of as-Saraya did not mention a single word about the social environment surrounding the palace of his maternal grandfather Mr. Hussein al-Harmeel having Bek title. He provided not a single brief footnote about “Mahallet Marhoum”, where the palace situated, and its people, nor did he mention anything about the relation of the people inhabiting the palace with those inhabiting the village, except for a few words about the man who was teaching him memorization of Quran, as Mahallet Marhoum – its real name is Mahallet El-Marhoum – is neighboring another village called “al-Gawharieya”. In al-Gawharieya lies the shrine of the pious man Sidi[2]al-Gohari” whom people believe can cause winds to blow and grant them good. In times of crises, they always raise their voices in supplication saying “Send us help, Gohari”.

Mahallet Marhoum is a village lying a few kilometers north to Tanta where women selling local Feteer or pies, milk, cottage cheese, butter and Gella or dry discs of dung used as fuel for primitive furnaces set out to sell them in Tanta. There, one can find the best tailors of Baladi or local Galabiyas and gowns. In that village, there were not big possessions of agricultural land like it was the case in other places in Delta, especially in northern Delta and Upper Egypt.

Here, as-Saraya – or the palace – looks like a closed greenhouse that contained the grandson who gave speeches at the masses of al-Wafd party’s supporters while he was still six years old!! Ironically, I remembered the late great satirist Mahmoud as-Sa’adani, whom Moussa was a friend of him, when he commented over what some media people used to say describing the Egyptian television that “It was born giant”. Al-Sa’adani said: “Born giant means it was born distorted, coz the normal thing is to be born a baby, then turn into a kid, afterwards a boy…etc.” I don’t know if it is true that the six-year old Moussa delivered an eloquent political speech, or he just sang a melody and chanted the name of an-Nahhas Pasha and al-Wafd party like it’s usually the case in some families when a child is being introduced to the guests and his folks ask him to reiterate the English alphabet, short verses of Quran or a melody he learnt at school in front of the guests.

In as-Saraya, there is no Tableya[3] of course. There is a dining table. The difference between the two is reflected upon the character of the person who sits to them as I will declare… perhaps I should say, as the memoir’s writer declared. As forTableya, it’s round where those eating sit next to one another, shoulder-to-shoulder with their hips neighboring. Sometimes, due to the many sitting to Tableya, some sit cross-legged with one knee bent to the chest and one arm stretched, mostly with the fingers and occasionally with the spoon, to reach out for the big plate containing food. Consequently, in sitting to Tableya one doesn’t feel superior or distinguished since it has no heading position, unlike sitting to the table or the square dining one that is different.

The difference became clear when Fathi ed-Deeb was sitting at the head of the table while Moussa, then a young attaché in the foreign ministry, was sitting at its far end, whispering to himself: when will I sit at its head? Trying time after time to reach towards the head, he finally said it in public after he became old in age and did his service in the ministry and the Arab League: “I want to be the president of Egypt...,” meaning I want to be the biggest head in this country. Unfortunately, he came forth in order in the presidential elections as I can remember. I believe he felt sad for this, for he depended on being Amr Moussa alone, with no clear electoral platform or new idea.

In as-Saray, the character of the father– the university lecturer whom the son did not say anything about his scholar discipline except that he was in the faculty of arts and that’s all –was missing. It’s important to mention the father’s specialty as it usually affects the composition, character, culture and orientations of the son who, unlike his father, didn’t join the faculty of arts, rather he chose the faculty of law.

In my opinion, such decision was due to being influenced by al-Wafd leaders whom most of them were law graduates. In such regard, I remember my phone call with Mr. Moussa, as he was kind enough to call me and complement my first article about his memoir, in which I told him that what he wrote about his insistence to join the faculty of law and his conversation with Sheikh Abo Zahra made me wonder why people at that time used to insist on joining the faculty of law.

I found out – perhaps I am wrong – that studying law was the closest field to the common education at that time, which was Al-Azhar, since both of their studies have to do, directly and necessarily, with the texts; texts of Quran and Prophet’s sayings in Al-Azhar, texts of Turath attributed to Sahabah, followers, founders of Madhhabs and writers of Mutoon[4] and Hawashi[5] or footnotes, texts of constitution, laws and by-laws in the faculty of law, then texts of final Cassation and Appeal verdicts and texts containing opinions of elite experts of law in every discipline, like as-Sanhouri, Sultan, Badr, al-Badrawi, Abo-Zahra and others. Moreover, dealing with the texts requires certain skills regarding the essence of the text, its philosophy, interpretation, manipulating it, making use of the gaps that legislators missed to address in it…etc.

For this reason, law people were stars in the time of British occupation and became leaders of the national movement, since pleading for the nation’s rights in independence, constitution and other things was required in facing the occupation’s bases, tanks, arms and ascendancy; whereas in the time of post-independence, an orientation for development and construction prevails. Therefore, technicians of engineers, people working in scientific fields and all their likes are required in post-occupation times.

The memoir’s writer talked about his maternal grandfather. He reminded me of the story our folks in the countryside of Gharbia governorate used to tell about the man who got married to the sister of the village’s mayor and had a son from her, and when people used to ask this son about his father, he answers: “My uncle is the village’s mayor!!”

I briefly searched about the origins of al-Harmeel family in what Ali Pasha Mubarak and al-Gabarti wrote in their books. I didn’t find enough literature except that Ahmed al-Harmeel appeared in the time of Muhammed Ali Pasha. As to the other two big families that I heard about them along with al-Harmeel, they were al-Khadem – literally means the servant – and ElBaradei. As to the first family, al-Khadem, they got their title from serving the shrine of Sidi Ahmed el-Badawi, and so they collected their fortune from the box of donations of religious vows. Whereas the second one got their title from the most thriving industry before mechanical means of transportation, like trains and cars, came to exist, that was making saddles – called Barad’a in Arabic – for donkeys and horses.

I don’t want to go on mentioning what I wrote about years ago regarding Muhammed ElBaradei; relative and colleague of Amr Moussa, as he was one of those who recommended the nice lady he got married to, and how ElBaradei dared to forge the documented recent history when he claimed that his father; the lawyer and once head of the syndicate of lawyers, was an opponent to Nasser. At that time, I published part of the minutes documenting the popular conference that recognized the National Charter of 1962 in which ElBaradei Sr. exaggerated in his hypocrisy toward the regime by asking to turn the syndicate of lawyers into a labor union.

The space allowed to me is about to come to an end. Unfortunately, I have a lot more to say, but I promised to make this article the last over this subject. I hope what I wrote does not affect the good relation I have with Mr. Amr Moussa.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar




This article was published in Almasry alyoum newspaper on November 1, 2017.

To see the original article, go to:

#almasry_alyoum #ahmed_elgammal #amr_moussa_memoir



[1] As-Saraya (Arabic: السرايا): in this context, it means the palace where the memoir’s writer was raised. There is a more direct word describing palace in Arabic; however, the writer is quoting the same word the man used in his memoir. In addition, this word in specific – as-Saraya – was used in the past by people to denote the palace or palatial residence of high-class people.
[2] Sidi: (Arabic: سيدي) transliterated for word meaning Master in Arabic. It’s said before calling names of figures people revere, especially those having religious or spiritual significance.
[3] Tableya (Arabic: طبلية): a low-elevated wooden table used for serving food in the past but not widely in use right now.
[4] Mutoon: (Arabic: متون) the Arabic plural word for muton (متن) which is the text containing the main idea.
[5] Hawashi: (Arabic: حواشي) meaning annotations, the Arabic plural word for Hashyia (حاشية) which is a brief marginal notation of the meaning of a word or wording in a text. It may be in the language of the text or in the reader's language if it is different.

Wednesday, 25 October 2017

What Amr Moussa wrote (2): missing facts




According to criteria of absolute necessity, what takes place in our country of grave incidents where martyrs die and blood of police and army men is shed necessitates that we tackle these incidents first… however, sometimes one finds himself before a duty that he shall not neglect… especially that it is not personal and has to do with the nation’s history and consciousness of generations… also, these grave incidents were proved not to take place if it wasn’t for the absence of consciousness of those who commit those crimes… and so, to me, they are all connected.

Today, I continue what I promised to tackle regarding the notes I called “footnotes over what Amr Moussa wrote”… I start by explaining two points misunderstood by some… the first was when I gave the example of the folklore proverb saying “do not mess with the whore lest she accuses you of adopting her conduct…” I meant a certain writer who meant to hint in an improper way to Dr. Hoda Abdelnasser… the second was when I wrote that we have a “genuine character”, I meant the one who wrote the memoirs – or better say “memories” – who fell in the trap of adoring himself the thing that necessitates seeking help from scientists specialized in psychology and psychiatry.

I revised written sources and other oral accounts from people who witnessed the time when Mr. Moussa worked in the foreign ministry until he left it… I committed – like a student studying history – to what I learned of research disciplines and found some faults that may amount to be committed on purpose regarding the account of the ex-foreign minister.

I will give some examples but not all of them as I have many… Mr. Moussa published a photo for Egypt’s delegation in India during the time of President Nasser and Mrs. Indira Ghandi… this photo includes the president, Field Marshal Abdelhakim Amer, Zakaria Mohie ed-Din, Anwar Sadat, Hussein ash-Shafie’, and Salah Nasr… this was what he wrote as a caption… it also includes Sedqi Soliman, Mahmoud Riad, Abdelmagid Farid, Salah ash-Shahed whose names he did not mention.

The truth is this photo was for Egypt’s delegation in another conference as the delegation that was in India included president Nasser, Anwar Sadat, Mahmoud Riad, Salah Nasr, and there were some aides of Riad accompanying him like Ashraf Ghorbal, Abdelra’ouf ar-Ridi, and Amr Moussa… and it was ar-Ridi who wrote the statement along with the Indian officials… in such regard, one should mention that the diplomatic and political norms do not give the title “member of delegation” to all who travelled or were present in the meetings… otherwise, they would have mentioned the names of secretaries, staff participating in Protocols, and others including drivers and cooks.

Mr. Moussa talked about the issue of Egypt’s debts to the United States but did not mention the fact saying that Egypt’s ambassador in Washington Abdelra’ouf ar-Ridi was the one who worked hard to drop those debts… and who convinced President Mubarak of the necessity to strike while the iron is hot… as Mubarak was hesitant until his ambassador told him to rest assured that the American would not get mad… afterwards, Mr. ar-Ridi exerted tremendous efforts with the Congress to get the matter done…

The whole details were mentioned in ambassador Abdelra’ouf ar-Ridi’ memoirs “life journey… Egypt and American… battles of war and peace”, chapter 18 from page 473 to page 493… I call upon all who look for the truth to have a look over the very important details mentioned in that book.

In such regard, Mr. Moussa who wrote his book titled “whether memoirs or memories”, does not cease, throughout his book and whenever he has the chance, to use a word – whether this word is attributed to him or other people like president Mubarak for example – that aims at degrading others or conveying an ambiguous meaning… perhaps the reason behind that – as I will detail later – is the character of Amr Moussa that is very obvious throughout the book and which is agreed upon by most of those who were close to or worked with him… it is that unbelievably “augmented image of oneself” to the extent that he negates any other one… especially if that other one was a rival or a competent one like Osama el-Baz, Ahmed Maher, Abdelra’ouf ar-Rid, and others.

For example he wrote in page 590 about Mubarak’s insistence to “change ar-Ridi immediately” which does convey an ambiguous meaning saying that ar-Ridi perpetrated an outrageous deed in the same degree that it conveys ambiguity from Mubarak’s side which he did not tell about… while ar-Ridi was already preparing himself to leave Washington at the beginning of 1992 as he knew he would reach the legal age of pension in July of the same year since he was born on July 2nd, 1932… for that reason, he started his visits and “goodbye” meetings to the American administration and Congress… another thing that may question the veracity of Moussa’s account is that the president who insisted on immediately ending the mission of ar-Ridi was the same one who asked ar-Ridi to call him after his return to Egypt… and it happened that the president invited him along with his wife to meet him in Burg al-Arab… and ar-Ridi and his wife spent about two hours with Mubarak and his wife.

As to what is related to al-Baz and Ahmed Maher as examples representing the other ones, Mr. Moussa intentionally meant to hint at them in an improper way in his book… however, Dr. Moustafa al-Feki and Dr. Farouk al-Baz replied to what was written about Osama al-Baz… as to Ahmed Maher, no one until now replied to what was written about him, especially what Mubarak said about him describing him as “the man who sets up problems for others”… I wish I have the time and effort to reply to what was written against the two late men whom Moussa mentioned in an improper way.

And so, we have here some facts that were not hundred percent correct… some narrated by Moussa from his own personal perspective telling a little part of the truth while some other facts were completely void of any truth.

Mr. Moussa also wrote about what he called “pursuing the Israeli nuclear program” and mentioned important details about the efforts he exerted along with the Egyptian foreign ministry in order to force the “Zionist state” – this term is mine and does not belong to Mr. Moussa – to submit to the treaty of Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons… however, he did not give due details regarding the failure in achieving such task… as what happened was that the United States of America changed the expiry date of the treaty of Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons from being subject to review every five years by the parties who signed it to being in force unlimitedly.

If one interpreted things in the same way as the writer of the memoirs did regarding some incidents and persons… and if one could use colloquial idioms, one would say to him “how clever you are in aiming at your target… is this the result of your pursuit?”… just to remind you, this phrase of “how clever you are in aiming at your target” was said by Stephan Rosti to Muhammed Tawfiq when the latter shot him by mistake when they were chasing their enemies… I shall continue writing about the “footnotes” for the last time in another article later.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar




This article was published in Almasry alyoum newspaper on October 25, 2017.

To see the original article, go to:


#almasry_alyoum #ahmed_elgammal #amr_moussa

Wednesday, 11 October 2017

“Footnotes on what Amr Moussa wrote” 1




The deliberate mix between the religious absolute perspective and the human relative one was the fuel of al-Fitna al-Kubra whose beginning, I believe, was latent since the conquest of Mecca when there were Muhajirun, Ansaar, and Tolaqaa’ or “The Migrants”, “The Helpers”, and “The Emancipated”… later, this Fitna grew a little in the day of as-Saqifah until the great upheaval of Fitna took place in the time of Uthman’s Caliphate… and I think its waves are still present to date.

It was when some of senior companions of Prophet Muhammed, including some of The Ten Promised Paradise, got involved… also, followers, followers of followers, and who followed them got involved… of course, there were nobodies whom history does not mention their names and who rushed to join that party or this group in order to make some gains of money or authority.

In my opinion, the culture – if one can use such term here – of al-Fitna al-Kubra is no longer limited to those having religious ideologies alone… but it expanded among some of those adopting man-made ideologies… whether liberal, pan-nationalist, or leftist... as one sees them issuing final moral judgments over the social and political phenomena and do not cease to act with bigotry in favor of an idea, orientation, person, or class… moreover, they feel no shame to disregard all disciplinary rules that govern scientific methods of tackling human phenomena, whether historic, political, or social.

In the beginning, I was very enthusiastic to read the first part of Mr. Amr Moussa’s memoir after I had heard him in a common gathering at a dear friend talking about the book and the effort exerted in it to come to light… I bought the book and started reading with a fluorescent marker in one hand and pen in the other… highlightening lines and paragraphs with the former and writing footnotes over the white margins with the latter.

I was ready to write however, that state of “al-Fitna al-Kubra”-like fighting made me hesitate a lot before going into such “fight”… specially that some went into this and some of them misunderstood the rudeness of whores to be the nobility of knights… in such context, one recalls the true old-in-time folkloric proverb saying “do not mess with the whore lest she accuses you of adopting her conduct”… and so, one should disregard what was written by those whom such proverb best suits them.

That was the first footnote over what Mr. Amr Moussa wrote… as to the second one, we find ourselves before an important source of the history of the Egyptian diplomacy… whether what has to do with the composition and performance of the establishment responsible for it; the ministry of foreign affairs, its mechanisms, relations, restrictions, and breaches that govern and intervene its work… or what has to do with its performance as an establishment or the performance of its leaders of ministers, deputies, and ambassadors… also, its relations with other establishments like the presidency and the rest of ministries…

It is known that the personal memoirs, just like the oral accounts narrated by those who participated in the events, are subject to the disciplinary rules set by research methods… and so, these memoirs are criticized from within inside, as well as from the outside perspective… furthermore, the character of the writer or the narrator is being studied regarding composition, orientation, preferences, also his mental state when he wrote or told his account… adding to this, comparing what came in this “testimony”, whether it is written diaries or recorded narration about certain incidents and circumstances, with other sources like documents, memoirs, and narrations of others who witnessed and participated in the same events… therefore, what Mr. Amr Moussa said in his diaries is not history, final judgment, or the absolute truth that should not be left untouched.

The third footnote over what Mr. ex-foreign minister wrote is the density of what he recorded as related to his family; his father, mother, and half-brother… his step-father, maternal family, and paternal one… also, what he wrote about “Mahallat Marhoum” village where his maternal family lived… “Bahada” village where his paternal family stay… Tanta where he was educated… and before this, Cairo neighborhoods where he lived part of his life… also, the network of family relations extending to well-off families of relatives, kins, and in-laws… and Wafd-party political leaders in specific… reaching to the wider network in the faculty of law and the ministry of foreign affairs… such things require one with good knowledge of the social aspects of life in the Egyptian countryside, especially between wealthy owners of agriculture land and the rest of the social classes’ pyramid… It also requires one specialized in analytical psychology, psychiatry, and also social psychology in order to give us an analysis for this “genuine character” that started to develop since its childhood until elderliness… a man believing he possesses a unique human composition that has its own charm.

The last footnote to mention in this space – as an introduction for what will follow afterwards – is, Mr. Amr Moussa confirmed during that kind gathering at our common friend that the book is empty of any linguistic mistakes or slips and it is so indeed except for some mixing in using demonstratives as “this” is preferred for the recent action and “that” for the far in time one.

That was an introduction for what will follow later… now, for those asking about the difference between “the footnote” and “the original text”… footnote is what is being added to the book to give more information or explanations… in such regard, one recalls that Sheikh Hassan al-Attar was the first to write a criticizing footnote discussing what was written in the original text after all footnotes were nothing but boring explanation… as to the original text, it is simply the script contained in the book.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar




This article was published in Almasry alyoum newspaper on October 11, 2017.

To see the original article, to go:


#almasry_alyoum #ahmed_elgammal #amr_moussa