Showing posts with label Egyptian university. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Egyptian university. Show all posts

Wednesday, 13 April 2016

New York Moral


 
Photo depicting university students in the 70's protesting extremism and repression against them

I think there is a strong connection between the social and cultural role played by Capitalism and the currently-disputed case in our Egyptian, Arab, and Islamic reality; that is religious discourse.

Before detailing, I’d like to point to some news circulated lately by some news agencies saying, as published by Alyoum es-Sabe’a[1] newspaper on April 4, 2016, that: “a coterie of more than 40 millionaires of New York state has delivered a letter addressing the state democratic governor, Andrew Cuomo, and state lawmakers, asking them to consider imposing higher taxes on the wealthier citizens of the state to help combat poverty and rebuild infrastructure”. The letter suggested imposing new taxes one percent higher on the state wealthiest adding that additional revenues should be allocated to help fight children poverty, homelessness, fragile bridges, tunnels, waterlines, and roads.

"As New Yorkers who have contributed to and benefited from the economic vibrancy of our state, we have both the ability and the responsibility to pay our fair share," the letter stated. "We can well afford to pay our current taxes, and we can afford to pay even more”. The signatories include some familiar names like Abigail Disney, Leo Hindery, and Steven C. Rockefeller.

The news continue: “The tax plan, known by the one-percent tax plan, was worked out in conjunction with the Fiscal Policy Institute — a left-leaning economic think tank”. “As a businessman and philanthropist and as a citizen of New York State, I believe we need to invest in our people and our infrastructure”, Hindery, the managing partner of InterMedia Partners, a media industry private equity fund, said in a prepared statement. The one-percent tax plan would increase taxes on people making $665,000 or more in income”.

The news ended but our inquiries, questioning, exclaiming, and stating, will not come to an end until we ask about our national capitalism role regarding all the nation causes, atop of them are the social ones like children poverty, homelessness, and basic services and ailing infrastructure including the dilapidated bridges, tunnels, water pipelines, and roads… just like that of New York wealthiest!

Here I move to the main issue I want to connect to that desired role of our national capitalism and renewing the religious discourse, as I believe the latter is part or a sub-branch of the cultural discourse. First, we have to differentiate between religious discourse of God as explained in his holy books starting from Scrolls of Abraham and Moses to Zabur[2], Torah, Injil[3], and Quran, and that one adopted by preachers of all religions as established by their followers and institutions in hierarchy. It’s known that Islam does not recognize that hierarchy or Clericism, but rather acknowledges Faqih[4].

If only our national capitalism took responsibility of its social role and stood against phenomena like that of Street children[5] or orphanages infamous for using poor orphan children in panhandling, prostitution, and what is alike, and if it could play its role in the funding crisis facing our educational and research institutions especially libraries, laboratories, playgrounds, students’ activities having to do with artistic innovation, it would be a vital arm in the face of terrorism and extremism.

In this context, I remember that a key factor in defending and delaying the collapse of our universities against extremism and terrorism conducted by Islamist groups in the beginning of the 70’s was the presence of the artistic and literature activities along with the trips organized by the university. I also recall, as I was head of the faculty of Arts students’ union and afterwards head of the post-graduate studies students’ union, that the union had many teams active in music, theatrical acting, poetry, novel, and journalism groups, and others. It was adorable to find the late Ammar Al Sherei[6] along with the rest of the music team standing next to the fountain situated at the faculty entrance chanting in the early morning. It’s was adorable as well to have a vibrant activity of the theatre where many great talents came to light like for example the two great directors Essam es-Saed and Mohsen Helmi, and the talented actors Farouq el-Fishawi, Sami Maghawri, Mahmoud Hemida, and others.

At that time, the regime, headed by Sadat, decided to use the Islamist groups to constrict and inhibit the Nasserism and Marxist leftist movements. The mission was accomplished indeed and university started to lose its soft power in producing the promising talents in the before-mentioned fields. Not to mention those extremist groups’ initiative, supported by the regime, to attack students’ activities in acting, poetry, literature, and gender segregation whether in cafeteria or in sitting on grass, as considered depraved and corrupt acts by them. Such attacks later developed to include physical assault by iron chains and fists, and switchblades.

I believe that national capitalism adoption of such causes like establishing theatres, playgrounds, funding acting, music, and artistic groups and teams in universities is one of the main ways to drain swamps of extremism and terrorism and renew our religious discourse in the same time. I hope what New York state’s wealthiest did will be a model adopted by the wealthiest of our beloved country especially that our Egypt deserves more; our nation dates back to thousands of years ago while that of New York does not exceed two hundred and fifty.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar



This article is published in Almasry alyoum newspaper on April 13, 2016.

#almasry_alyoum#ahmed_elgammal#Egypt#national_capitalism#70’s#Egyptian_university#extremism#Islamist_groups

Link of the article in Arabic:
http://today.almasryalyoum.com/article2.aspx?ArticleID=501170&IssueID=3930


Links related to the story:




[1] Alyoum es-Sabe’a or Youm7(Arabic: اليوم السابع, meaning The Seventh Day) is an Egyptian privately owned daily newspaper published in Arabic. (Source: Wikipedia)
[2] Zabur(Arabic: زبور) is, according to Islam, the holy book of Dawud (David), one of the holy books revealed by God before the Qur'an, alongside others such as the Tawrat (Torah) of Musa (Moses) and the Injil (Gospel) of Isa (Jesus). (Source: Wikipedia)
[3] Injil: (Arabic: Gospel)
[4] Fiqh is the human understanding of the Sharia — sharia expanded and developed by interpretation (ijtihad) of the Quran and Sunnah by Islamic jurists (Ulama) and implemented by the rulings (Fatwa) of jurists on questions presented to them. Fiqh deals with the observance of rituals, morals and social legislation in Islam. In the modern era there are four prominent schools (madh'hab) of fiqh within Sunni practice and two (or three) within Shi'a practice. A person trained in fiqh is known as a Faqih (pluralFuqaha).
[5] Street childrenis a term for children experiencing homelessness who live on the streets of a city, town, or village. Homeless youth are often called street kids and street youth; the definition of street children is contested, but many practitioners and policymakers use UNICEF’s concept of boys and girls, aged under eighteen years, for whom "the street" (including unoccupied dwellings and wasteland) has become home and/or their source of livelihood, and who are inadequately protected or supervised. (Source: Wikipedia)
[6] Ammar Al Sherei(Arabic: عمار الشريعي) (16 April 1948 – 7 December 2012) was an Egyptian music icon, performer and composer.

درس من نيويورك


 
صورة لتظاهرات الحركة الطلابية في السبعينات

أذهب إلى أن هناك ارتباطاً وثيقاً بين الدور الاجتماعي والثقافي للرأسمالية وبين القضية التي تفرض نفسها بإلحاح على الحاضر المصري والعربي والإسلامي، وهي قضية تجديد الخطاب الدعوي الذي اشتهر باسم "الخطاب الديني"! وقبل أن أفصل في ذلك المجمل أود الإشارة إلى خبر تناقلته بعض وكالات الأنباء ويقول ما نصه نقلا عن اليوم السابع يوم 4 إبريل 2016: "كتبت مجموعة من أكثر من 40 مليونيراً في ولاية نيويورك خطاباً إلى حاكم الولاية الديمقراطي أندرو كومو وكبار نواب الكونجرس، دعتهم فيه إلى بحث زيادة الضرائب على السكان الأكثر ثراء في الولاية للمساعدة في مكافحة الفقر وإعادة بناء البنية التحتية". ويقترح الخطاب فرض ضرائب جديدة أعلى بنسبة واحد بالمائة على أثرياء الولاية. وأضاف الخطاب أنه يتعين توفير إيرادات إضافية لمعالجة فقر الأطفال والتشرد والجسور المتهالكة والأنفاق وخطوط المياه والطرق، وتابع الخطاب "كسكان نيويورك الذين ساهموا واستفادوا من الحيوية الاقتصادية للولاية لدينا القدرة والمسؤولية على تحمل نصيبنا العادل، ونستطيع تحمل الضرائب الحالية وبإمكاننا دفع أكثر من ذلك"، ومن بين الموقعين على الخطاب أبيجايل ديزني وليو هندري وستيفن روكفلر.. ثم يستطرد الخبر: "يجرى العمل على خطة الضرائب المعروفة باسم خطة ضريبة الـ1% بالاشتراك مع معهد السياسة المالية، وهو مركز بحثي اقتصادي ذو توجه يساري". وقال هندري، الشريك الإداري لشركة إنترميديا في بيان مصاحب للرسالة: "كرجل أعمال وفاعل خير ومواطن من ولاية نيويورك، أعتقد أننا نحتاج الاستثمار في شعبنا وبنيتنا التحتية.. خطة ضريبة الواحد بالمائة تجعل من الممكن تنفيذ هذه الاستثمارات.. وتتطلب من أشخاص مثلي مواصلة دفع ضرائب أكبر، كما ينبغي علينا.. خطة واحد بالمائة ستخلق معدلات ضرائب أعلى على أولئك الذين يجنون 665 ألف دولار أو أكثر".

انتهى الخبر، والعهدة على الوكالات واليوم السابع، ولن تنتهي التساؤلات الاستفهامية والاستنكارية والتقريرية عن دور ومواقف الرأسمالية المصرية من كل قضايا الوطن، وفي مقدمتها القضايا الاجتماعية "فقر الأطفال والتشرد".. وقضايا الخدمات الأساسية أو التحتية "الجسور المتهالكة والأنفاق وخطوط المياه والطرق"! مثلما هو اهتمام أغنياء نيويورك! وهنا أنتقل إلى القضية الأساسية التي أربط فيها بين هذا الدور الرأسمالي المنشود وبين تجديد الخطاب الدعوي "الديني"، لأن نقطة البدء عندي هي أن الخطاب الدعوي جزء أو فرع من الخطاب الثقافي، إذ لا بد من التمييز بين الخطاب الديني الذي هو من لدن الخالق- جل وعلا- في كتبه السماوية التي عرفناها من صحف إبراهيم وموسى إلى الزبور والتوراة والإنجيل والقرآن، وبين الخطاب الدعوي الذي يتكفل به الدعاة في كل دين- حسب ما استقر لدى أتباعه ومؤسساته من تراتبية في هرم الدعاة- ومعلوم أن الإسلام لا يعرف هذه التراتبية الهرمية وليس فيه رجال دين بل فيه من تفقَّه في الدين وصار عالما تتوافر له الشروط العلمية وليس الإكليروسية.

ولو اهتمت الرأسمالية المصرية بدورها الاجتماعي، وسعت إليه، وطالبت به، وأصرت على أن تتصدى مثلا لمشكلة أطفال الشوارع ودور الأيتام التي لا يمر شهر أو شهران إلا وتفوح رائحة فضيحة مأساوية من نوع استغلال اليتامى في التسول والدعارة وما على غرار ذلك، وأيضاً تتصدى للأزمات التمويلية التي تحاصر المؤسسات التعليمية والبحثية، خاصة المكتبات والمعامل والملاعب والأنشطة الطلابية المتصلة بتجلية الإبداع الأدبي والفني، وفي هذا ما زلت أذكر أن جانباً رئيسياً من جوانب تأجيل انقضاض الجماعات المتأسلمة على الجامعات قبيل مطلع السبعينيات هو وجود الأنشطة الفنية والأدبية والرحلات، وأذكر، فيما كنت آنذاك رئيساً لاتحاد طلاب الآداب، وبعدها ممثلاً للدراسات العليا، أن كان في الاتحاد فرق للموسيقى والتمثيل المسرحي وجماعات للشعر والقصة والصحافة وغيرها.

وكما كان بديعاً آنذاك أن يقف الراحل الجميل عمار الشريعي ومعه مجموعة من فريق الموسيقى بالقرب من نافورة مدخل الكلية في الصباح المبكر، وبديعاً أيضاً أن المسرح لا يتوقف عن النشاط، وفيه تخرجت مواهب عظيمة، أذكر منها على سبيل المثال وليس الحصر المخرجين الكبيرين عصام السيد ومحسن حلمي والممثلين فاروق الفيشاوي وسامي مغاوري ومحمود حميدة وغيرهم، وعندما قرر الحكم آنذاك- وكان السادات رئيساً- الاستعانة بالجماعات الإسلامية لضرب حركة اليسار الناصري والماركسي، تم تقويض هذا النشاط الكبير وبدأت الجامعة تجف أوراق مواهبها الواعدة في تلك المجالات، ناهيك عن مبادرة الجماعات إياها، مدعومة من النظام، بالهجوم على التمثيل والشعر والأدب والاختلاط والجلوس في الكافتيريا وافتراش "النجيلة"، باعتبار كل ذلك فسقاً وفجوراً، ثم انتقل الهجوم إلى الفعل البدني بالجنازير والمطاوي والقبضات الحديدية.. وهنا أجد أن اتجاه الرأسمالية المصرية لتبني إنشاء مسارح وملاعب وتمويل فرق التمثيل والموسيقى وجماعات الإبداع بالجامعة هو إحدى السبل الرئيسية لتجفيف منابع التطرف الإرهابي، ولتجديد الخطاب الدعوي في آنٍ واحد.

ولعل ما أقدم عليه أثرياء نيويورك يكون هادياً لأثرياء المحروسة، خاصة أن بلدنا يستحق منا الكثير، ولو بحكم أن جذورنا تمتد فيه لآلاف السنين عمقاً، فيما أثرياء نيويورك لن تمتد جذورهم لأكثر من مائتين وخمسين سنة.

نشرت في جريدة المصري اليوم بتاريخ 13 أبريل 2016.

لينك المقال:
http://today.almasryalyoum.com/article2.aspx?ArticleID=501170&IssueID=3930

Thursday, 31 March 2016

No excuse for culprits involved


 
Cairo University dome

I hope what I write may receive any response from officials in charge, and not like the poetry verse saying:
I call on all those alive and have ears to hear.
Unfortunately, they are dead.

I doubt those lines may find any response from officials in charge of higher education and universities as to what has become epidemic diseases in our tertiary education and academia with its long-established customs and traditions laid down long ago by pioneers and legendaries who have known true meaning and value of knowledge. Those officials are not the only ones to blame but you can add to the list university professors, departments’ heads, deans, chiefs and members of promotion committees in charge of granting academic degrees of assistant professor and professor, in addition to committees in charge of granting scientific degrees like master and PhD.

I have received, through my e-mail and Facebook page, tens of comments and hundreds of approving e-mails or Likes for my last week’s article in which I apologized for my dear late friend Dr. Ali Mabrouk[1], the article that described the grief suffered by Egyptian citizen when humiliated in his homeland when no rights are guaranteed to him by his citizenship. The article described suffering of university professor when faced by tyranny of those in charge of taking decisions in academia in Egyptian universities.

As a result, I believe we should bring the whole matter under light; all that has to do with our academia in both its vertical dimension represented in assistant teachers, teachers, assistant professors, and professors, and its horizontal one connecting all those with their students, educational institutions’ administration, and society as a whole. This case concerning our university and academia has a lot of deficiencies that we should take action to stop and put on the right path, that action that should be adopted by those feeling it’s their duty toward themselves and their country to take action since rights turn into duties when we stick to them and defend them.

Before I go further, I’d like first to ask Dr. Hossam Eissa[2], the respected university professor and national intellectual concerned with his country’s present and future, to declare to the whole nation, in details, the reality of academia and scientific research in Egypt. I also urge him to disclose how enormous and serious those troubles inherent are to the extent that we may say it’s shameful we have let things deteriorate to this level. I ask him since he – Dr. Hossam Eissa – was in charge, for a period of time, of this very important file and I guess he has suffered a lot in this. Dr. Hossam was not only a minister of higher education but also a deputy prime minister.

In my opinion, the first thing to start with is the damage inflicted with the ethics and scientific criteria controlling academia and universities as meanings and terms have been misinterpreted compared to when the Egyptian university and academia was first established and developed. For example, scientific degrees granted, like masters and PhDs, are no longer due to efforts exerted by researcher in choosing the topic for his research or collecting data according to its field of specialization after applying scientific discipline tools and research criteria to reach the final formula and content for his thesis, but rather became mostly due to the relationship between the researcher and his supervisor, members of research discussion committee, and may be with the librarian in case the researcher is conducting a theoretical research or the one in charge of the laboratory in case the researcher is including some practical experiments in his research. In the latter case, you can simply give a blind eye about established research ethics and researcher ability to search, innovate, and acquire adequate personal skills if that researcher is a student of X or Y, or if he could simply manage to find a shorter path, not caring if it was more costly in terms of ethics or money, not even if the price was his own dignity.

Such thing had its direct devastating effects on the academic manner of those who had the degree through this twisted way; they look fully-established professors in terms of time spent in their claimed research to get the degree, in the number of researches required, and also due to gaining approval of the discussion committee. But actually they are not university professors at all in terms of their inability to pronounce a proper Arabic sentence or writing one line without grammatical or spelling errors, not to mention their inability to add any new to their field of specialization. Moreover, all this had its terrible effects on the long term as revenge spirit rules once those so-called professors reach retirement and become professor emeritus not enjoying their past authority anymore when their ex-students, now tenured professors, seek vengeance for what they suffered on their hands.

Other terrible issues that are now dealt with as non-negotiable established reality like academic plagiarism represented in stealing part of a dissertation or even the whole of it; they give it a nickname called quoting, not to mention running after secondments outside university in ministries, government agencies, oil-rich Arab countries, consulates and cultural consultancies in Egyptian embassies abroad.

I know some will say university professors should be excused for their salaries and income are not enough to fulfill their needs and provide for their families, not to mention their spending to buy references and follow the latest researches in universities of the developed world. Some, meanwhile, will claim that this is the definite result of free education to the rest of what we all know is nothing but nonsense. To all those I say I do not agree with you for I think the opportunities available due to increasing salaries of teaching staff in government universities and high-tuition fees private ones refute all your claims, in addition to communication and information technology revolution that enabled one to have access to unlimited sources, references, and academic periodicals while having morning coffee; the thing that is amazing indeed.

University has failed to play its expected role toward culture and society while gaps separating it from its main mission; that is producing science and delivering proper education, became immense both in size and depth. Consequently, university role in building the nation’s present and laying foundations for its future collapsed.

There is no way to change present or reshape the future unless we start afresh… we start defining terms like what real education and scientific research are and how to bring true meanings of such concepts to our Egyptian academia and universities once again.

Again, May you rest in peace my dear friend Ali Mabrouk, and may God bestow his mercy on you and the poet who said:
The dead are not those who died and rested in peace… the real dead are those breathing empty-soul ones.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar



This article was published in Al Ahram newspaper on March 31, 2016.

To see the Arabic article, go to:

#alahram#ahmed_elgammal#Egypt#Egyptian_university#scientific_research#professors#ali_mabrouk#academia




[1] Ali Mabrouk: (Arabic: علي مبروك) (1961 – 2016) was a professor of Islamic philosophy at Cairo University and one of the prominent thinkers of Islamic heritage and contemporary Arab thought. (Source: https://almanassa.com/ar/story/1354)
[2] Hossam Eissa: (Arabic: حسام عيسى) an international law professor at Ain Shams University in Cairo and ex-minster in Hazem el-Beblawi cabinet.

Thursday, 24 March 2016

Apology to Ali Mabrouk[1]


 
Dr. Ali Mabrouk

I owe a heartfelt apology to Ali Mabrouk, the Egyptian citizen, professor of philosophy, and multi-discipline highly-esteemed intellectual, brave and vigilant patriot, and human… who stayed for the last moments of his life struggling to fulfill his humanity. I was eager to meet him after I read his articles in Al Ahram in the same page and day when my article is published and after I read and understood one of his books. Once I met him, all barriers were left for we had the same face features of countryside people and our intellectual and spiritual inclination had the same genes. I felt no shy to tell him in presence of our common friends that I learn from him and that sometimes I find it difficult to understand some of his lines and so attempt to reread them more than once. On his side, he recommended what I write and say on TV. Afterwards, we were close enough to share our burdens and pains. However, his were more severe than mine as he suffered persecution and negligence which I didn’t suffer like him.

I apologize for Ali Mabrouk, the Egyptian citizen, for all the efforts we exerted to bring to reality a state of citizenship where citizens can enjoy their rights in good life, were very modest and worn-out. I apologize for the dream we left behind; a dream of a republic where limits between classes are almost nonexistent, a republic where freedom, socialism, and unionism are maintained, a republic where concepts of self-sufficiency, justice, and equal opportunities are guaranteed. I apologize for we have given away that dream and accepted – despite our refusal and struggle – to live as mere numbers and tenth-class citizens. We even stood still watching when our county was traded in the regional and international market and being dealt with as satellite state. That’s why Ali Mabrouk couldn’t have a single right of his citizenship’s despite his knowledge, scientific degree, intellect, integrity, decency, and honesty.

I apologize to Ali Mabrouk, the professor of philosophy, for we haven’t tried to discuss the oppressive atmosphere dominating in the Egyptian academia and universities – atop of them of course is Cairo University – despite the wide pages in papers we write in, the hours we were allowed to appear on TV, and the public gatherings we’re usually invited to. We didn’t pay due attention to revealing the intrigues and low-level behavior adopted by those whom only the biological coincidence brought them in charge of taking decisions governing our academia, those who kept persecuting the efficient and hard-working people and degrading their excellence to prevent any comparison that would definitely show their real value compared to those hard workers.

We even contributed to attracting publicity for those claiming to be heritage researchers and leading religious thinkers who are aware of modern-time interpretations and true teachings of religion. It turned out that those imposters, as proved later when you see their stance toward Ali Mabrouk and Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd[2], are nothing but primitive machines meant to repack and rewrap what was already produced and well digested before.

I apologize to Ali Mabrouk, the intellectual, nationalist, and human, for we didn’t continue, not even for once, any of the dozens of attempts and efforts we exerted to build the cultural and civilization bulwarks against our present-time Tatars who exist in all fields, either those religion-proclaimed ones or others who claim to be scientists, seculars, liberals, and believers of scientific research freedom while actually they are more dangerous and even incomparable to the cancer inflicted by muslim brotherhood, salafists, thieves of public fund, and all their likes. They sought to nail the honest Ali Mabrouk and spared no efforts in doing so to destroy his scientific and philosophy project. They undermined his morale and drove him to disbelieve in his country but it was in vain; they failed. However, he was lonely.

We became closer, me and him. I tried to publish his banned articles outside Egypt. We used to meet and sit to discuss a single phrase in a line searching for alternative word here or there lest the article is banned again from publish. Publishing was his own way of breathing and feeling free until an unintentional and unexpected interruption took place when I fell sick due to my back pains. That’s why I didn’t know about his bigger-than-mine suffering. My friend, whom I cry and owe an apology, suffered from Liver disease. Those mean incompetent bastards treacherously and mercilessly persecuted him. Of course, his immune system was affected due to the exhaustion inflicted with his mind and nerves while trying to afford his children and family expenses and all that he needs as to references. The little sum he used to have out of his academic position was not enough in any way to provide for him, especially after he fell sick. I wish I hadn’t fallen sick… I wish I had continued to help him through that publishing.

Ali Mabrouk left our world after morally destroyed, just like what happened to Nasr Abu Zayd. If Ali, the philosopher and university professor who educated generations, had been one of those who fill full sheets of paper of filthiness, triviality, and nonsense and then call it a novel, story, or poem, he would have found many standing by his side defending him against those bastards in university; he would have found many conducting debates, holding conferences, and even protesting against those who persecuted him, or he might have even found a room among those paid by rulers to talk about nations’ fate.

May God bestow his mercy on you my brother and forgive me for what I owe you.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar



This article was published in Al Ahram newspaper on March 24, 2016.

To see the Arabic article, go to:

#alahram #ahmed_elgammal #ali_mabrouk #Egypt #egyptian_university #egyptian_academia




[1] Ali Mabrouk: (Arabic: علي مبروك) (1961 – 2016) was a professor of Islamic philosophy at Cairo University and one of the prominent thinkers of Islamic heritage and contemporary Arab thought. (Source: https://almanassa.com/ar/story/1354)
[2] Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd(Arabic: نصر حامد أبو زيد; also Abu Zaid or Abu Zeid (July 10, 1943 – July 5, 2010) was an Egyptian Qur'anic thinker, author, academic and one of the leading liberal theologians in Islam. He is famous for his project of a humanistic Qur'anic hermeneutics, which "challenged mainstream views" on the Qur'an sparking "controversy and debate”. While not denying that the Qur'an was of divine origin, Zayd argued that it was a "cultural product" that had to be read in the context of the language and culture of seventh century Arabs, and could be interpreted in more than one way. He also criticized the use of religion to exert political power. In 1995 an Egyptian Sharia court declared him an apostate, this led to threats of death and his fleeing Egypt several week later. (He later "quietly" returned to Egypt where he died.) (Source: Wikipedia)