Showing posts with label Sudan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sudan. Show all posts

Wednesday, 17 January 2018

Message from Sudanese thinker Haidar Ibrahim Ali (1-2)




I received the following message from Professor Dr. Haidar Ibrahim Ali; head of the Sudanese Studies Centre. I knew the honorable man more than thirty years ago. He is a prestigious Sudanese professor and thinker. I do not exaggerate when I say that he is a human thinker whose thought and human composition exceed limits of nationalism.

Professor Dr. Haidar comments in his message or it’s better to say he gives evidence in his message for what I wrote in a previous article about Sudan. In that article, I called upon “Almasry alyoum” newspaper to hold a seminar about the Sudanese-Egyptian relations and invite Sudanese figures to this seminar. However, the editing management omitted the newspaper’s name from the article’s heading without prior permission from me. I actually thank them for such change as it’s more convenient this way since “Almasry” will not respond to the initiative and in this case, this would have been embarrassing for both parties; the writer and the publishing institution. Though, I did not pay attention to this as there are other things more important than discussing ethics of the relationship combining the publisher and the writer.

Now we come to the message I received from the Sudanese polymath Dr. Haidar Ibrahim Ali:

Dear Brother Ahmed Elgammal,
I wish you are doing fine. I also wish you a happy new year in which all your long-awaited wishes can come true. I thank you for your initiative aiming at pushing away this mode of political depression prevailing on both sides. Such thing is well seen through the bad language heard, gross discussions adopted, the inability to conduct an objective dialogue, also in giving green light for media outlets using vulgar language; the thing that contributes to messing with the awareness of the masses. Such vulgar and bullying-like discussions moved to TV studios that became more like spots for consuming drugs.

I couldn’t believe what I read in the papers and saw over the screen wondering: Have we really reached this limit of cultural and political deterioration? As I belong to that generation which has an image of Egypt in his mind totally different to what takes place on the ground or what we see and hear. As I witnessed when I was still young prior to independence the slogans chanted defining the kind of mutual relations with Egypt saying: “Long live the unity of the Nile Valley.” Such unity was perceived by some as the unity of the two peoples under the Egyptian royal regime. The Left, meanwhile, used to say: “Long lives the common struggle;” that was the struggle against occupation.

At that time, the Egyptian universities were teeming with Sudanese students. Also tens of brilliant students were dispatched in “As-Sanhouri study mission” at the end of the forties to France. Later, they came back to lead the national patriotic movement and some of them even assumed important positions in the national governments. Sudanese border guards, meanwhile, were patrolling the Egyptian borders defending their second homeland. They also made neighborhoods inside Cairo like Ain Shams and Al-Gabal Al-Asfar look like Sudanese ones. Tens of marriages between Sudanese and Egyptians took place.

During that period of time, Sudanese poets like Gaili Abdel-Rahman, Tag as-Serr al-Hassan, Muhammed al-Fitouri, Mohie ed-Din Saber, Mohie ed-Din Fares, Gemaa’ and Abdullah ash-Sheikh al-Bashir were shining stars in Egypt’s gatherings of literature people. Before them, al-Akkad encouraged novelist Mu’awiya Nour to write in As-Siyasa newspaper and he did. Also at establishing Al-Masa’a newspaper at the beginning of the sixties, Gaili Abdel-Rahman was assigned the task of supervising the culture page.

As to Sudan during that period of time, Cairo University – Khartoum branch was considered an academic, intellectual and cultural enlightening institution. Khartoum University does not forget Dr. Abdel-Aziz Ishaq who, upon coming back to Egypt, established “the African League” giving the opportunity for shining stars interested in Africa and Sudan like Muhammed Fa’eq, Abdel-Malek ‘Ouda, Helmi Sha’rawi and Botros Ghali to appear.

The best of what was written about Sudan in Arabic was written by Egyptians; atop of them is Abdel-Magied Abdeen who wrote “History of Arab culture in Sudan”, also in mid history the reference was Mustafa Musa’ad’s writings, later were Shawqi al-Gamal, Muhammed Fou’ad Shokri and Nasim Maqar, in literature were ‘Abd Badawi, Ezz ed-Din Ismail and Muhammed an-Nuwaihi. I myself have studied in the High Institute for Teachers – later the faculty of education – at the hands of Dr. Muhammed Zaki al-‘Ashmawi who introduced me to modern poetry. He used to wander in the lecture hall with his ancient roman stature reading to us in his sonorous melodic voice poems of Abdel-Mo’ati Hegazi “The way to the lady” and those of Salah Abdel-Sabour “Hanging Zahran” and plays like “Oedipus the King”.

I also studied Al-‘Arud or the study of Arabic prosody and snippets of Semitic Languages at the hands of Dr. Khalil ‘Asaker. Writings of Dr. Sa’ad Maher Hamza were of the early contributions in economy, also writings of Dr. Kamal Desouqi in socio-psychology, Salah ed-Din ash-Shami in geography, Dr. Muhammed Awad Muhammed who authored the copious reference: “Northern Sudan and its tribes,” also book of Dr. Abdel-Qader Mahmoud titled “Sufi thought in Sudan” which was the first attempt in this academic branch. We cannot forget Dr. Muhammed Mohie ed-Din ‘Awad in the branch of Law and Dr. Tolba ‘Owaida who opened his heart and Zagazig University which he established for the Sudanese when he came back to Egypt. Many of those who love Sudan specialized in authoring books about Sudan; such writings were marked by both academic impartiality and lovingness as well. Atop of them are Mr. Helmi Sha’rawi who studied in Juba University, late Mr. Youssef ash-Sherif and Mr. Ahmed Hamroush, and Mrs. Amina an-Naqqash.

We belong to a generation who knows well how blood and souls of both Egyptians and Sudanese were shed in prisons of Ibrahim Abdel-Hadi during the royal era. In such regard, Ahmed ar-Refa’i wrote in his biography titled “Distinguished Leftist” the following: “Few days after I was released, one of my companions came knocking the door exclaiming: “do you know that Salah Beshri is dead? And that today is his funeral?” I felt very sad. Salah was my colleague during my imprisonment time; the Sudanese engineering student diagnosed with Tuberculosis and who was deprived of medication in order to make him kneel and surrender,” page 128. A protest holding the corps of the Sudanese patriot swept Cairo – that was the relation between Egypt and Sudan you Ahmed Moussa and Tawfiq Okasha. The government sent his body in a military plane to be buried in his hometown Atbara in an attempt to appease the anger.

At that time, dogmatic groups like muslim brotherhood and communists used to have common membership in the two countries. For example, “HADITU” movement had decided that the communist Sudanese becomes automatically a member of the Egyptian group when he comes to Egypt and vice versa; the Egyptian member of HADITU becomes automatically member of the Sudanese communist party when he goes to Sudan.

We shall continue the message and article next week.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar




This article was published in Almasry alyoum newspaper on January 17, 2018.

To see the original article, go to:


#almasry_alyoum #ahmed_elgammal #Egypt #Sudan #Haidar_Ibrahim_Ali #history

Tuesday, 2 January 2018

Sudan and Egypt





I know a little bit about the history of Sudan and Sudanese – Egyptian relations. I’m also honored to have Sudanese friends of various ideological orientations and different levels of education and culture. We also have common things allowing us to be sheer frank and exchange jokes over the contradictions in the behavior of some Egyptians and Sudanese. I also understand the reservations some Sudanese have over some policies and stances of the Egyptian governments, also regarding how the Egyptian intellectuals perceive the mutual relations with Sudan and its reality.

Despite all that and although I’m always keen on understanding what happened and is happening, I can hardly understand what is happening now and what has been happening for several years, as it’s like a logarithm for me unable to decipher and is getting more and more complicated. As I can see a zigzag wiggly graphical line representing the mutual relation between the two countries with tops affirming the eternity and depth of relationship between the two countries or one can say the one people distributed between north and south and who have one common history; past, present and future, also strong connections in affinities and blood spilt in field battles against the Zionists and before this against the British occupation. Then suddenly and unexpectedly the line drops to bottoms telling of a strained present full of all kinds of problems and alerting of a gloomy future

My Sudanese friends used to criticize us, Egyptians, for using a feminine form when talking about Sudan like we do with Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen. And also because we talk about it as if it’s the backyard of the River Nile valley or Egypt, moreover, because our movies and TV series in the past used to cast dark-skinned people in roles personating characters of inferior jobs or works, hinting that they are Sudanese or Nubian. Also, some of my Sudanese friends used to trace history back to the time of slavery and how some Egyptian traders were involved in such thing, and that many Sudanese houses still keep the robes, shackles and stakes hanged on its walls. In addition, some other friends used to talk in pain about how the Egyptian intellectuals and politicians are ignorant of the Sudanese cultural, ethnic and demographic composition… etc.

In return, my Sudanese friends did not hide their ridicule over that, as they regard the Egyptians as the ones with the “fair complexion” whom al-Mahdi rejected. They also call the Egyptians “Halab”, meaning thieves that do not live up to the Sudanese race. I used to always share the joke they tell describing the Egyptians’ ignorance of Sudan saying that: “a Sudanese man once asked his friend an exclaiming rhetorical question: Why do the Egyptians not understand the situation of Sudan and are always mistaken in their policies towards us despite their ancient civilization, modernization and pioneering in more than one field starting from music and singing and not ending by literature and arts? His friend answers: It’s very simple; some Sudanese pee in the Nile and Egyptians drink its water!”

However, the behavior and stances of the ruling regime in Sudan towards many issues, most importantly the relations with Egypt, are really hard to understand as the Sudanese leadership is deliberately angering its neighboring country to the north by allowing the Qatari and Turkish existence on its lands, the thing that reached to what we knew about Sawaken island and the military coordination with Egypt’s enemies. Before Sawaken there was that thing of the Ethiopian dams, atop of them is the Renaissance Dam, and the Sudanese situation siding with Ethiopia to the detriment of the deal that is not only guaranteeing Egypt’s share of the Nile waters, but it also has to do with Egypt’s life!

Faced by this dilemma or entangled roll of thread, we should start away from the concerned Egyptian official institutions and entities and launch a popular initiative to try to catch the beginning of the thread and detangle it bit by bit until we get things right once again. There are preliminary things to start with, for example, to start talking about Sudan as the Arab country heading the Arab nation towards Africa and not the backyard of Egypt. Also we can help broaden circles of Sudanese – Egyptian communication so that ordinary Egyptian people can taste and listen to the Sudanese music and singing, read the Sudanese literature written by great eminent writers, know about the cultural, political, demographic and geographic composition of Sudan even if just broad lines… etc. We should also widen the scope of studies specialized over Sudan in specific and over Africa in general.

Before ending my article, I call upon any entity keen on maintaining the relationship between the two countries, in light of what that means regarding the danger threatening Egypt’s life and security, to start by organizing a series of seminars with Sudanese figures of academia, intellectuals and artists in the first place participating, hoping that with enlightening popular efforts we can find solutions to what the official policies on both sides complicated. I wonder if Almasry alyoum institution can adopt such initiative?!

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar




This article was published in Almasry alyoum newspaper on January 3, 2018.

To see the original article, go to:


#almasry_alyoum #ahmed_elgammal #Sudan #Egypt #Sawaken_island

Thursday, 21 April 2016

The fallacy





The biggest and most dangerous fallacy - if not a lie – regarding the two islands’ issue is that some deliberately intend to divide dispute or quarrel parties into two categories. The first one includes those believing the two islands are Egyptian and that we should stick to our rights in them shouting out loud that land is honor, dignity, and homeland itself. The second, meanwhile, includes those believing the two islands are Saudi and should be returned back. Such differentiation describes the first group as the patriot one we should listen to and worthy to decide the nation’s fate while the second was the one including the traitors who agreed to cede our sovereignty on the two Red Sea islands to Saudi Arabia; meaning they agreed to give away our honor and dignity, and hence we should not listen to them or even let them live on our land.

It’s not the first such incident in our contemporary history, especially after July 1952 revolution. Although History does not repeat itself, its incidents sometimes may look alike giving the same moral. Almost the same false arguments and dissemination took place at the time of the Anglo-Egyptian agreement of 1954 regarding evacuation of English troops, and even raged after signing and declaring the agreement to the public. Criticism, attack, and even claims of betrayal were leveled at Gamal Abdel Nasser and his fellow Free Officers[1]. No one of those attackers, who behaved as symbols of patriotism and honor and considered themselves the sage philosophers and genius professors of law and diplomacy of all times, paid attention to the efforts exerted by Nasser and the experts and scientists; members of the negotiating delegation, not even to the objective circumstances governing the negotiation atmosphere along with all the tiny specific details connected to the case. Nasser was then-Prime minister and head of the Egyptian delegation in negotiation. He was accompanied by Abdel Hakim Amer[2], Abdel Latif al-Bughdadi[3], Salah Salem[4], and Mahmoud Fawzi[5]. The agreement included thirteen articles in addition to other annexes and attachments. However article no. 12, which included three clauses, was the one under heavy attack.

The first clause in article no. 12 stipulated that: this agreement shall be effective for a period of seven years as of signing date. The second: the two governments shall negotiate during the last twelve months of the agreement’s effective period to decide all necessary measures that should be taken at the end of the agreement. The third clause: this agreement is rendered ineffective after seven years starting as of the signing date, and government of the United Kingdom shall transfer or take action regarding what is left of its proprieties in the Suez base at that time unless the two governments agree on extending this agreement. The fourth article also received fierce attack of betrayal claims for it has stipulated: “in the event of an armed attack by some outside power on any state member of the common defense pact of the Arab league signed upon in Cairo on April 13, 1950, or on Turkey at the signing of this agreement, Egypt shall provide to the United Kingdom all that is necessary to prepare the base for war and guarantee its effective management. Such facilitating measures include using the Egyptian ports within limits specified by ultimate urgency for the purposes before mentioned”. Severe criticism and claims of betrayal were directed at Nasser and his fellows accusing them of not expelling the English troops at once and that they gave away Egyptian territory when they agreed to the return of the English troops to the Suez base and Egyptian ports... Days passed and Britain was expelled not only from Egypt but also from the history of big nations after the Tripartite Aggression of the Suez Crisis on 1956 took place, in addition, the agreement was declared null and void.

Another example of such incident was when Egypt signed the agreement acknowledging Sudan’s right in self-determination provided that full self-governance in Sudan should start at once. It was on November, 1952. At that time, attackers claimed that July 1952 revolution had given away the Egyptian territory as they considered Sudan part of it, and called Nasser a traitor for he has agreed to give the Sudanese the right to decide their fate. Until our present time, some still refer any problem arising between Egypt and Sudan to that so-called giving away by Nasser and the July revolution.

All those hurling criticism, now and before, forgot what Nasser and the July revolution did when they called for the right of people to decide their fate and that freedom of countries is inseparable of that of people. They forgot that Nasser outshined in the whole world through two consecutive decades because he was one of the pioneers calling for national liberation. They also forgot that Egypt stood for the right of Third World countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America to liberate.

Turning back to Tiran and Sanafir issue, I stop by those who made such ugly dissemination and say – ignoring for the first time names and lines written, including someone pretending to be the philosopher of all times – I think we should now focus on two issues. First, we should let our parliament fully take up its role as to debating the accord of outlining the Egyptian-Saudi maritime borders as per all criteria of precision in order to come out with the right decision. The second is to avoid any aftermath that may affect our relation with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and our brother Arabs in states of the Gulf Cooperation Council for I believe the siege imposed on our country from all sides; west, east, north, and south, requires that we should keep good relations with our direct eastern neighbor who did not hesitate to stand by our side at the darkest moments because our neighbor believes that Egypt collapse would eventually lead to his, sooner or later.

In my opinion, it’s not a matter of sticking to land or giving it away, nor a matter of betrayal or patriotism, but rather a matter of wrong or right judgment. The first lacks multi-sided justified causes while the second depends heavily on those justified causes. Nasser signed the Anglo-Egyptian agreement of evacuation on 1954, and before that al-Nahhas Pasha[6] signed the Anglo-Egyptian treaty of 1936, and time was enough for Egypt to overcome what was not in her favor.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar



This article was published in Al Ahram newspaper on April 21, 2016.

To see the Arabic article, go to:

#alahram #ahmed_elgammal #Egypt #july_23 #1952 #gamal_abdel_nasser #Sudan #Tiran #sanafir




[1] The Free Officers(Arabic: حركة الضباط الأحرار) were a group of nationalist officers in the armed forces of Egypt and Sudan that instigated the Egyptian Revolution of 1952. It operated as a clandestine movement of junior officers during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. Muhammad Naguib joined the Free Officers in 1949, after the war, and became their official leader during the turmoil leading up the revolution because of the hero status he had earned during the war, and his influence in the army. (Source: Wikipedia)
[2] Mohamed Abdel Hakim Amer(Arabic: محمد عبد الحكيم عامر) (11 December 1919 – 14 September 1967) was an Egyptian general and political leader. (Source: Wikipedia)
[3] Abdel Latif Bughdadi(20 September 1917 – 9 September 1999) (Arabic: عبد اللطيف البغدادي) was an Egyptian politician, senior air force officer, and judge. An original member of the Free Officers Movement which overthrew the monarchy in Egypt in the 1952 Revolution, Bughdadi later served as Gamal Abdel Nasser's vice president. The French author Jean Lacouture called Boghdadi "a robust manager" who only lacked "stature comparable to Nasser's. The two leaders had a fallout over Nasser's increasingly socialist and pro-USSR policies and Bughdadi subsequently withdrew from political life in 1964, although he mended ties with Nasser before the latter's death in 1970. (Source: Wikipedia)
[4] Salah Salem(Arabic: صلاح سالم) (September 25, 1920 – February 18, 1962) was an Egyptian military officer, and politician, and a member of the Free Officers Movement that orchestrated the Egyptian Revolution of 1952. (Source: Wikipedia)
[5] Mahmoud Fawzi(Arabic: محمود فوزى) (19 September 1900 – 12 June 1981) was an Egyptian diplomat and political figure of Circassian origin who was Prime Minister of Egypt from 1970-1972 and Vice President of Egypt from 1972-1974. (Source: Wikipedia)
[6] Mustafa el-Nahhas Pasha or Mustafa Nahhas(Arabic: مصطفى النحاس باشا; June 15, 1879 – August 23, 1965) was an Egyptian political figure. (Source: Wikipedia)

Tuesday, 21 April 2015

Sudan


 

We, in Egypt, have always reiterated a phrase expressing our great hope in a complete Arab renaissance based over the union of the golden triangle; Egypt, Libya and Sudan, then we start elaborating on this saying: “Egypt has the knowledge, experience and working force, while Libya has the oil and financial resources and Sudan has the vast arable land, rich nature and abundant water resources”.

 

We keep repeating such words without paying attention to the grave negative effect resulted from such saying, even among the supporters of this thought in Libya and Sudan. Libyans and Sudanese simply see an inflated Egyptian ego when we say such thing, and maybe they also see ignorance and shallow way of thinking when we talk about Libya and Sudan in such way that sees nothing of them but their natural and financial resources, as if no people or humans exist there.

 

It is even worse on the Sudanese side in particular because we keep reiterating what we think is an eternal truth expressing Egypt’s relation to Sudan when we say that Sudan is the backyard of Egypt and that both countries have been ever one until separation took place at the July 23rd ruling era. Moreover, some of us consider Sudan an Egyptian governorate… and maybe things worsen more when the Egyptians, and intellectuals in specific, address Sudan using the feminine form “she”. They also do the same thing with Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan and Yemen although all these nations have masculine form.

 

I remember all this while I am following the hot argument between Newton and Dr. Haider Ibrahim after the former wrote in his column in Almasry alyoum newspaper what the latter thought was an affront towards Sudan as Newton cited Sudan as an example for the deterioration of civilization.

 

Newton apologized in his reply to Dr. Haider’s message but complicated the matter even more when he said that he considers Sudan an Egyptian governorate, which has the same meaning of affiliating and considering Sudan part of Egypt. As t Dr. Haider, he is an old friend, university professor and prestigious Sudanese intellectual. He is one of the academics always trying to bridge the gap between scientific research and academic curricula on one side and politics practice on the other side. He was, and still is, one of the staunch supporters of freedoms and democracy and one of those who paid the price for committing to their stances.

 

After receiving a call from the common friend; Eng. Nabil Morkos, I called Dr. Haider to placate him and conciliate his angry stance taken against the haughty stand of some Egyptian intellectuals. To do so, I reminded him of the joke some Sudanese say. The joke says a Sudanese once asked his fellow: “hey, Zoal[1]… how could our fellow Egyptians not understand Sudan; its history, composition, reality and culture while they have an ancient civilization very old in history… they built the pyramids… they have figures like Um Kulthoum, Muhammed Abdel-Wahab and others?” Then the other Sudanese fellow said: “I’m amazed you don’t know the reason!”. The first then asked: “what is it?” The second then replied: “it’s very simple… we pee in the Nile then they drink from it!”.

 

There is also in the relatively-extremist Sudanese heritage some sayings about “the redness Mahdi refused”; meaning the white complexion of Egyptians and Englishmen that Muhammed Ahmed el-Mahdi; leader of the Mahdist War, disliked… another talk about “King Nammar” and his ability to defeat the Egyptian military campaign… a third one about some Sudanese keen on keeping at their homes the shackles which some Egyptian slave traders used to fetter the Sudanese slaves in slave markets

 

What I want to say here is, if we searched for negativities in the old relations between the two countries, we would find many things to tell at such situations of misunderstanding like the moment when Dr. Haider picked what Newton wrote whom I think did not mean to insult the Sudanese people since he immediately apologized.

 

There are also some Egyptians, especially opponents of July, 23rd revolution and Nasser, who consider Sudan’s separation from Egypt a big crime committed by the revolution and add this to the crime of Sinai occupation after 1967. Meaning they considered that pre-July, 1952-Egypt was extending from the Mediterranean Sea in the north to beyond the Equator in the south and from Palestine’s borders in the east to Libya’s borders in the west, but then everything changed and Egypt lost a lot of land after 1952, in their opinion of course. It is in vain when you try to tell them that Nasser was one of the pioneering figures calling for National Liberation and nations’ right of self-determination and that it was not impossible, while the national Sudanese desire to separate from Egypt was growing, that Egypt denies the Sudanese will… and hence came the referendum that resulted in separation.

 

I do not want to go on discussing the answer to the question asking: was Royal Egypt really ruling Sudan and had control over it during the British occupation? There is also what Mahdi said when he decided – that was before the July, 23rd revolution era – to deal directly with the British and not the Egyptians. He said: I want to deal with the carriage driver and not the horses drawing it.

 

Let us forget about the past and think of the present… and future if possible. In such regard, we cannot take any step forward for the benefit of both countries until the Egyptian elite bunch in all fields are fully knowledgeable of Sudan; its history, composition, culture, arts, people nature, capabilities and the possibilities, here in Egypt and there in Sudan, of having common interests, projects…etc. As I believe that the absence of such knowledge concerning Egypt’s neighboring countries westward, eastward and southward is the reason behind our unjustifiable and serious delay in achieving the integration between the golden triangle and the rest of the Arab countries in the Arabian Peninsula and Levant.

 

Regarding this point – lack of knowledge and information – I remember and would like to remind you of a very important factor behind our defeat against the Zionist enemy; that is the lack of information we had over this enemy. Therefore, studies and research centres concerned with the Israeli, Zionist and Jewish matters were established after 1967. These studies even flourished in Hebrew language departments in the Egyptian universities. Matters even developed to the extent that we have some figures of researchers, experts and novelists active in communicating with the Hebrew state and its community. They even get mad at whoever disagrees to their orientation and accuse anyone opposing normalization of relations with the Zionist society of being ignorant, fanatic and even psychopath.

 

Let us deal with Sudan, Libya and the rest of the neighboring Arab countries in the same way those pro-normalization with the Hebrew state want us to do. Here, I know some of them will say that we can make use of what the Zionists achieved in science, scientific research and its applications, but what can the other neighbors provide us with as compared to the Hebrew state?

 

The answer to this question will need much more space than this one allowed here. It is enough to say what I said at the beginning; because those Arab neighbors are rich of the oil, financial resources, arable lands and other natural resources, not to mention that their peoples love Egypt and have endless strong connections to it. These Arab countries also have a heritage of civilization, cultural richness and valuable human experiences in more than one field, not to mention that Sudan in particular is the cultural gate of Egypt, Arab countries and Islam into the African continent. This will always be the truth.

 

In addition to Newton’s apology, I would like to apologize to Dr. Haider for the misunderstanding that occurred.

 

 

This article was published in Almasry alyoum newspaper in April 21, 2015.

 

To see the original article, go to:

http://ahmadelgammal.blogspot.com/2015/04/blog-post_21.html

 

#almasry_alyoum #ahmed_elgammal #Egypt #Sudan




[1] Zoal (Arabic: زول): a word in Sudanese slang meaning man.