Showing posts with label Sisi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sisi. Show all posts

Thursday, 14 March 2019

Assassination and character assassination





In a moment I threw away what I was reading and stared not believing what I heard and not imaging that this person was saying with such stubborn insistence… I saw Seif Abdel-Fattah; that face that I saw tens of times in seminars, conferences, lectures, meetings and on TV screens… I do not want to describe his features lest some may say that I talk about people’s faults.

I here impose an exclaiming and denying question in the same time; how a professor of political sciences in the biggest and most important Egyptian university, and also an intellectual, who regarded himself and people too regarded him as one who belongs to that political ideology which came to be called the balanced enlightened Islamic current. He was as well one of those who had the opportunity to be part of the highest-level presidential team ruling Egypt… How can he ask in public with such clear words and confident voice tone to get rid of the Egyptian president?… not feeling ashamed or hesitant while the TV interviewer was asking him one time after another over the same matter for him to reply back every time confirming that we first have to get rid of the president in order to save the country, otherwise, nothing will change!!

For a while, I could not understand what I heard… later, after my astonishment went away, I started to think… I could understand that the circle is now complete and what we used to write about and were desperate to explain that it was right –while others used to accuse us of mixing things in a false way and exaggerating describing us with the worst characteristics– turned out to be actually right. As we used to say and write that what is called the enlightened Islamic political current along with its figures of thinkers, writers, university professors and ex-judges are an inseparable part of the bunch regarding themselves guardians judging people’s religion, and that they do not aim at spreading the elite humanitarian and religious morals, but actually are targeting authority and ruling power, and that such political current have long deceived people. However, when they came to power in a way that we now know who did it and how they did it, everything became clear and they revealed their true face!

Seif Abdel-Fattah –along with some of his male and female colleagues in the faculty of economy and political sciences– were always working at establishing and spreading an idea what later turned out to be a big hoax; this idea says that it is possible that political Islamization may have a modern enlightened face believing in citizenship and democracy. That bunch used to include other people that I do not want to mention some of their names after they hid themselves away from fame lights that used to surround them in the press, TV, radio, seminars and conferences. Then, after muslim brotherhood came to power, such enlightened thought, modernization, citizenship and democracy became worn out slogans that outdated and were no longer used.

Such thing always reminds me of that Umayyad Caliph who used to pray day and night and read Quran in Qa’aba for decades before appointing him a Caliph. However, once he heard that he became a Caliph, he put the Quran aside and talked to it saying: “Now, I’m done with you”. The first feast that Caliph had was for dinner and he got it over the dead bodies of his opponents of his own folks, while some of them were still moving; not yet dead under the feast’s tables with the food served above!

While I was thinking after my astonishment went away, I realized, feeling totally certain, that the fears that long surrounded us and some thought were over, are not over yet. First of these fears is the armed bloody terrorist conspiracy threatening the life of the June, 30 revolution’s leader and currently president of the republic whom I respect and cherish for what he does for the country, despite I know that there are many faults in the current policy. This conspiracy also threatens all those regarded as enemies and opponents by muslim brotherhood, salafists and so-called enlightened Islamic political ideology. As the matter is not about the president alone, but –following the same logic– has to do with targeting all those considered –by Seif Abdel-Fattah with what he is supposed to have of mentality, culture, knowledge and awareness in addition to his likes– as dangerous persons threatening the muslim brotherhood plans.

As we all know, this unjust bunch can easily find what supports their corrupt ideology throughout the historic course of political islamization to give themselves, and those who believe them reasons justifying killing others. Even if such killing was like what Mursi once said in a public speech: “What would happen if we sacrificed a million people for the society to live”!!

We are still facing a real danger that is not yet over. Actually, it may increase in the coming time targeting certain circles and figures, as that bunch, in my opinion, bets that more killing, blood and terrifying people may push many to give up, even if the price is having the unjust muslim brotherhood authoritarianism back to ruling power controlling the destiny of our country.

In such context, I do not believe that people will keep getting deceived in this “Taqiyya” which the salafists hide themselves, their ideas and actions behind, as I believe that once they feel there is a glimpse of opportunity that muslim brotherhood may come back to power after shedding floods of blood, they will reveal that they support the Islamic rule and nothing else. I am also sure that they will come up with tens of Fiqhi interpretations providing them with reasons justifying what they did after muslim brotherhood left power.

That was Seif Abdel-Fattah who remained in Egypt in his home with his family after June, 30. I remember that I phoned him once to check on him and had a joke with him saying that I could hear children crying around him and asked if he could still have young babies. He answered that they were his grandchildren. Later, he left Egypt; not jailed or killed. There are also others whom I see on Facebook and have close strong relation with some. I know that they used not to have any political interests. Now, one sees them picking a word or action for the president or any other responsible to make silly jokes thinking themselves staunch opposition figures. Despite the triviality of what they write and which reveals their desire to have more “Likes” from some nuts, I think this is the other side of what Seif Abdel-Fattah said; it is an attempt to assassinate the person himself and assassinate his character.

May God save Egypt and protect its institutions and all those who take the responsibility paying honest and sincere efforts to save our country.

Translated by: Dalia Elnaggar
This article was published in Al Ahram newspaper on March, 14, 2019.

To see the original article, go to:

#Ahmed_Ahmad_elgammal #Egypt #president #Sisi #character_assassination

Wednesday, 13 March 2019

The question deserving an answer



I wrote two consecutive articles during the last two weeks in Al Ahram newspaper about the issue of amending the constitution. It looks like Mr. Newton does not read but Almasry alyoum newspaper, or he reads the other ones but considers what is not published in Almasry alyoum as nothing!

From this specific point to our life in general, I would like to say that one of our public life’ evils –in specific regarding the political and cultural aspects– is the ego, to a degree that may reach denying the other party and what may accompany such thing of claiming to own the truth and pushing the other party to abandon his opinion to believe in or adopt what that egoistic party wants, otherwise, this other party would be described as intellectually-retarded, superficial and what he writes is useless!

In the same context, I would like to mention that what was said that some point their weapons and rush to write if someone talked about or tackled a certain époque or character while they do not bother to follow the current events and discuss the serious issues that deserve paying attention to, is an abrupt wording. As the matter started with those who kept attacking a certain époque, with each one of them stabbing based on his own motives and background. Some of them are of political backgrounds that are not different in their contents to the biological backgrounds. Adding to this, there is someone playing the role of Maestro; directing and encouraging them. Moreover, he suggests the point they should target with their stabs. When talking about thought and politics, one may say that for every action, there is an opposite reaction that may exceed the action in its power; that is why talking about history and going far in defending a certain époque in a just way came as a reaction for what Mr. Newton used to be the maestro for!

Anyway, I now beg your pardon to discuss a specific issue; that is how prepared we are as a society –specially the politicians, thinkers, intellectuals and owners of huge interests in this society– to think about scenarios of imminent dangers that surround us on the domestic level and abroad, specially that there are regional powers that have and will never cease to break the Egyptian will and destroy the active Egyptian existence to guarantee their own superiority… not to mention the huge amount of our domestic problems and issues that I doubt any one has paid any effort in listing, describing or even detecting their future course or results.

I believe that the issue of the Egyptian political composition; meaning the form of the regime, core of its philosophy and role of its institutions, including the constitution, all this should be considered in the context that we question, in order to see the controversial relation between our reality, the imminent domestic and foreign threats, also the future ones, and between that political composition that should accommodate responding to those challenges… As to getting busy with consecrating the texts, this is part of an old issue that has to do with both; getting busy with and working on, texts since the Mihna or the ordeal regarding the creation of Quran that erupted thousand years ago and whose repercussions still exist. As I have already written in an article published in another newspaper, those who always called to prove that the divine text is a historic one that can be dealt with like any other text are the same people fighting staunchly for consecrating the constitution texts and calling for the sanctity of not getting close to it, not even with interpretation, except for what they want!

I still confirm that like it was once said that wherever the nation’s interest is, this is God’s law. It is also possible to say that wherever the country’s interest is, this is the essence of the constitution’s texts.

Regarding our discussion about threats – away from the theory of conspiracy, I believe that studying the current courses and future orientations of the regional powers in our region comes in the heart of studying our own future. In clearer words, Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Ethiopia have all declared some of their goals for the few coming decades. It is also certain that they have other goals they have not declared in such context, just because such goals depend on other countries like Egypt, where the Egyptian role was and will always be a point of concern for everyone, whether when it is powerful and at its peak, or even when it is weak. What confirms how important the matter is, is what Egypt witnesses currently of signs of economic recovery, foreign relations, and also in fighting terrorism.

I do not exaggerate when I say that the political and media discourse for president Sisi in the Arab-Euro summit that took place recently in Sharm Ash-Sheikh was a sign of that recovery. I know that it is better for Egypt’s relations towards the region and its powers, which I pointed to some of them, is to make a skillful balance so that we do not have a severe hostile rupture of relations among the different courses over the common interests. However, it should be managed in a smooth and agreeable manner in a way guaranteeing that Egypt will finish the recovery process it started and will not go through what it has been through in the nineteenth and twenty centuries; meaning the renaissance projects of Muhammed Ali, Ismail Pasha and Nasser.

Translated by: Dalia Elnaggar

This article was published in Almasry alyoum newspaper on March, 13, 2019.

To see the original article, go to:

#Ahmed_Ahmad_elgammal #Egypt #Sisi #renaissance_project #amending_constitution

Thursday, 21 February 2019

The Arab-European relations… changing courses




Summit conference means that opponents of the highest level representing the participating countries are meeting, regardless of the population, wealth or income of such countries. We witnessed before Arab summits for the Arab countries, African summits for the African nations and Islamic summits for the Islamic countries. Now, and for the first time, we have an Arab-European summit on the land of Egypt. Such thing has cultural and historical significances, not to mention the political, economic and strategic ones.

It is already known that we cannot perceive the big events in the human course unless we go through interpreting the maps. In this context, I do not mean the intersection of latitude and longitude lines, nor the distribution of land and water or even the rest of geography branches. Rather, I mean the key maps to understand the international relations throughout history and anthropology. Through such kind of maps, we can realize that the region of civilizations which witnessed the very beginnings of the civilization cycles since ancient times is mostly a Mediterranean region if we broadened the Mediterranean circle containing countries looking over the Mediterranean sea to go deeper to the south to include Sudan and African Horn, and towards the east to include Iraq and the Arabian peninsula. If we did this, we will find significant representation for ancient civilizations; those of Ancient Egypt, Phoenicia, Babylon, Assyria, Nabat, Sheba and Africa along with the Hellenic, Hellenistic, Roman and Christian civilizations.

Through such summit, it became clear for the first time –and on a collective level- what was before fragmented when we had two-country summit; one of them is Arab and the other is European, discussing political, economic, military and strategic issues or interests. Now, we can have coordination between the comprehensive European security and the Arab one on a broad level exceeding the military, intelligence and police side to the rest of life perspectives including culture and religious beliefs.

History witnessed times when the European side was the one dominating, as a conqueror and occupier, since the time of Crusades in the middle ages. After this came the beginning of the modern colonization movement starting with the Portuguese and Spanish colonization in the sixteen century. Afterwards, the British and French role increased in the nineteenth century and what followed after this regarding conquering and occupying most of the Arab Countries. This thing led to deep gaps between the two parties until the American role came to exist as a new colonization. The world went into two world wars followed by cold war. In parallel to this western course, there was another course adopted by the Arab side; that was the resistance to get independence and liberation.

No sooner had the Second World War come to an end, than the Arab national liberation movement became stronger, and Egypt was the leading nation in that. Also, the Palestinian cause was in the centre of that conflict as Britain, and later followed by the United States, was the biggest supporter for the Zionist immigration to Palestine, later came the establishment of and support for the Zionist state, and so the conflict between the Arab side and western side escalated, and the region witnessed three wars; 1956, 1967 and 1973.

A lot of water flew under the bridge which we cannot detail right now, including that western Euro-American approach to depend on creating and enflaming conflicts among the region countries themselves with the aim of dismantling them more and more. Also, the religious side was the weapon used most extensively to achieve such thing. Such thing goes back to the British approach called “Divide and Rule” that aimed at enflaming the sectarian strives, and not to our present time. The Egyptian state went through such thing under the British occupation since the 1910 conference supported by Lord Cromer. Also, establishing Israel as a state for a Torah-based religious minority was not away from such context we are talking about.

Later came the approach to establish pacts on a religious basis like the Islamic Pact and Baghdad Pact, then the approach was to enflame the Sunni-Shiaa and Islamic-Christian conflicts. Throughout all this, the European-American-Israeli interferences were apparent until it happened that Europe and the United States caught the same fire themselves. At that time, everyone came to realize that there is no other way but to change the whole approach, and that there is no other alternative to setting the base for a different new era.

As Europe was attacked by two threatening problems; terrorism and immigration, it discovered –before anyone else- that its societies are not safe away from the actual threats and real dangers which the Arab countries have been through. And so the new way of thinking was to adopt an approach aiming at working on localizing the religious fundamentalist ideologies in the Arab region, the place where they first came to exist, so that if it happened that there were countries in this region ruled by those groups of fundamentalist ideologies, they; the fundamentalist groups, would have been satisfied with that, meaning that they will consume their hostility in their internal conflicts, either within these groups or between them and the rest of the society powers. In doing so, the region can fall in the religious swamp and will not come out of it for the coming centuries. And so, we had what was called “The Arab Spring” and all that we have witnessed and still are witnessing. The big surprise was that Egypt escaped that destiny. Not only escaped and survived, but also proved its ability to overcome its hardship and set on its course for comprehensive renaissance.

It is certain that history will record in proud recognition the role the Egyptian leadership played and is still playing represented in President Sisi on two levels; the first is ensuring stability, security and accelerated progress in Egypt including its balanced creative foreign policy. And the second is the political discourse adopted by the president addressing the whole world, especially Europe, regarding the unity of the common destiny between us and them. The thing which necessitates full cooperation in achieving comprehensive security which, as I said before, exceeds the military, police and intelligence side to the economic, social, cultural and political side. Europe became sure they will not be able to fight waves of fundamentalist terrorism unless they support the balanced Da’waa discourse which Egypt called for and works on through its Da’waa institutions.

Therefore, this Arab-European summit on the land of Egypt comes as a result for the approach proven to be right and is still proving its viability day after day; that is the approach of cooperation and working on the comprehensive political, economic, cultural and social aspects. Such approach will come to full success with more hard working and achievements in the region countries to put an end this vicious triangle of “poverty-ignorance-terrorism”.

This article was translated by Dalia Elnaggar



This article was published in Al-Ahram Al-Arabi magazine on February 21, 2019.

To see the original article, go to:

#ahmed_ahmad_elgammal #terrorism #Egypt #Sisi #Arab_European_summit_in_Sharm_Elsheikh

Wednesday, 24 May 2017

No time for gibberish




History calculations are different to calculations of a grocery shop… as the first contain no retail business, wholesale business, or anything in between, meaning semi-wholesale… however, history calculations are about introductions, courses, and results… they also include vicious fights where blood may be shed, people killed, wills broken, and nations looted.

In grocery shop business, there is the clever merchant… but in history, we have the historical individual… the first has his eyes fixed over the cash drawer filled with the money… the second has all his senses fixed over the country even if the drawer is empty and money was little.

The historical individual could be a charismatic hero who enjoys the leadership talent and talent of communicating with the masses… and he could be a person who was assigned the responsibility – according to all given circumstances – of saving his country and leading it amid a very tough situation… not only on the outside level but also on the domestic one as well… he accepted the challenge and went on with his eyes fixed over the best interests of his country… even if some yelled out loud saying that there is nothing; no water, no supplies, no rest, and no clear vision… while he is steering his ship through the right course realizing how to carefully maneuver so that his ship or country does not get sucked in the turbulent sea.

This not a rhetoric speech trying to hide the problems we suffer in our very own composition… but a reality we live every moment since Abdelfattah as-Sisi became the leader and muslim brotherhood were ousted form ruling the country.

According to grocery shop calculations, prices are soaring high… the market is ruled by the evil people… people are financially exhausted and about to beg… but according to history calculations, it is a tale of people fighting along the leadership of their state a multi-level with different sides battle… it is the same epic of struggle that this very same people had been through many times before throughout history.

It is a matter of people being told in public that the one occupying the highest position in the state will not be able to go on alone through these tough circumstances… people being told that the circumstances are difficult starting from schools, hospitals, factories, resources, to the rest of all fields… and that all of us have no other solution but to exert efforts and work hard day and night… in addition to the regional and international situations that leave no chance for anyone to ignore or deny them… and that there is no alternative to working hard in order to ameliorate the conditions and remedy injustice

As the one who realized the lesson learnt from The Convention of London of 1840 that stopped the renaissance project during the time of Muhammed Ali… and later the international collusion against Ismail Pasha… and what happened in June, 1967 to hit the renaissance project of Gamal Abdelnasser… and who also realized the difference between surrendering to the tough circumstances like in the times of Sadat and Mubarak, and skillfully maneuvering to evade surrender… this one has to learn from history… if that one understood, realized, and started to practice what he learnt on the ground, he would become that historical individual I mean.

According to retail business calculations, we can have an estimation of expenses… like how much was there in the Egyptian treasury, what happened, and how much is there now?... how many mega projects were accomplished?... what their feasibility studies recommended?... what is still under progress?... what happened in the armed forces regarding arming, variety of arms’ sources, training, fighting conviction, protecting the country against terrorism, corruption…etc?... in the same manner, we can tell how many projects are left and what is needed in more than one field?... there are specialists who master the language of economy and finance in such regard.

However, I believe I am about to talk about history calculations that start by analyzing the situation our country lived in the last four decades… then focusing on the last six years; how were we on the economic, social, and political levels and how were the region and the world?... then what about our situation now?

Also, what about problems of social cohesion and sectarian problems?... what about the national will and Egypt’s role in its African and Arab regions and its relations with the rest of the international community?... also, what about completing the constitutional building of our country?... what about fighting corruption that hit every part of our country?... what about the criminal and political security amid the current situation of targeting our nation in more than one place and corrupting its living cells so that it does not rise again… in addition to many big issues that we should pay attention to alongside issues of living and situation of parties and communities.

To me – and I believe I have a good knowledge of understanding history – I see our country going through the most fierce phases of engaging with those contexts… and it is not possible in any way for any fair person who has a complete systematic vision, capable of spotting the comprehensive courses we are in right now and not stopping before secondary details, to give a thorough evaluation saying what was done and what is left… all what any fair person can say is that we have the right weapons for the battle… and that our will will not be broken… and that surrendering and letting things go without accountability is definitely unlikable.

We are in the very heart of the battle and the battlefield is in turbulent movement… I believe no one of those engaging in this battle could take off his armor and put down his weapon to talk gibberish about what is going on in the battlefield.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar



This article was published in Almosawwar magazine on May 24, 2017.

To see the original article, go to:


#almosawwar_magazine #ahmed_elgammal #Egypt #Sisi #history

Saturday, 4 February 2017

The president’s wife… and Egyptian braid




I kept asking myself: why did you immediately agree to write about such subject and not take your time to think and maybe apologize for not doing it?... Can feeling shy to say no to your friends affect your conviction to keep a distance between you and the decision maker or the regime?

I asked myself as I actually have no detailed information about the character, composition and life of the wife of the president. I believe such information may only be available at the family. I also had fear that some may think I’m writing this to play hypocrite to the current regime, and was even more afraid that some might think – in light of the literature that maybe published in the same edition of Hawaa magazine – what I’m writing is a contribution to imposing a public role for this lady, the thing which may remind us of some ex-presidents’ wives that were once very well-known for their influential roles in the public domain and who even kept asking for more.

Despite that, writing for Hawaa magazine for the first time is a tempting experience as it’s a magazine specialized in women affairs and women have a distinguished role in our lives– and mine in specific –not to mention that I have memories with Hawaa magazine since I used to search for it and for “Bent An-Neel” magazine in Tanta streets for my elder sister and mother to read them and take “le patron”.

Also, writing about the leading role of women is not less important if not more important than other things, as the Egyptian woman played and still is playing an undeniable role in deciding the political choices in the very critical times. In addition, there were women who reached the status of being regarded sacred by the Egyptians. In such regard, I’d like to remind you that our beloved Egypt is distinguished by the many braids it has, as we have the young girls’ braids, braids woven from the dry leaves of palm trees, braids of robes woven from the dry fibers surrounding the palm trees’ trunk… we also have other cultural and civilization braids that no one else on earth has, like the braid of Khamsa we Khemiesa as Khamsa means five in Arabic while Khemiesa is the smaller form of five.

Khamsa we Khemiesa is thought to be the amulet protecting Egypt from the evil eye, any envious enemy and against evil in general. I kept searching until I found out that the Egyptian five or Khamsa is different to the Hebrew one with the hand palm stained with blood decorating the entrances of houses as the hand is immersed in the blood of the carcass then printed over the doors lest death angel comes searching for the inhabitants of the house. Its origin has to do with the curses mentioned in the Torah that prophet Mousa or Moses put on the Egyptians including the curse of death for the first-born child or animal. When Moses’ followers asked him: “How will the angel of death distinguish our houses from those of the Egyptians?” He asked them to have a carcass and dip their hands in its blood then print it over the doors and so the houses would be marked by this sign.

As to the Egyptian Khamsa, it means the five holy families that visited and lived in Egypt and blessed and got blessed in return from it. They are the family of prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) and his family, prophet Ya’qoub (Jacob) and his family– meaning prophet Youssef (Joseph) and his brothers –prophet Mousa (Moses) and his family, the Holy Family of Eissa (Jesus), Mary the virgin and Youssef El-Naggar (Saint Joseph) then Ahl al-Bayt or People of the House of prophet Muhammed– peace be upon him –who chose Egypt as a safe refuge protecting them against the Umayyad.

As to Khemiesa or the incomplete Khamsa or five, meaning three, it’s really an amazing thing to tell as I found out that those three are the three women Isis, Mary the Virgin and Sayyidah Zainab daughter of Imam Ali and sister of Imam al-Hussain whom the Egyptians called her Um Hashem the Virgin. It’s really strange that the Egyptians called Sayyidah Zainab with the title virgin just like Isis the virgin who gave birth to her son Horus without having sexual intercourse with her husband and brother Osiris killed by the God of Evil Set who mutilated his body and threw its pieces in the then-more-than-forty branches of the Nile. Later Isis reassembled those pieces, put them back together, laid down next to them and then got incorporeal conception with the God of Good Horus.

As to Mary the Virgin, she too gave birth without getting married. Her story is already known when the Jews and Roman decided to kill her son and we all know what happened in the Holy Week and Calvary when she was crying in patience.

Then we come to Um Hashem whom the Egyptians granted her a great status and called her virgin despite that she got married. They did so because she too lived the hardship of her family and killing of her brother al-Hussain in the battle of Karbala. She also protected his son Ali Zayn al-Abidin with her body and headed the procession of slaves of prophet Muhammed’s grandsons standing before Yazid bin Mu’awiya.

These three women are the Khemiesa protecting Egypt. This reflects how the loyal sacrificing patient women are revered in the Egyptian consciousness. So, it’s loyalty, fidelity, sacrifice and patience that give women their revered status in the consciousness of the Egyptians and nothing else since the Khemiesa of “Isis-Mary the Virgin-Um Hashem” was taken as a symbol for protecting our beloved Egypt along with the five holy families.

Egypt witnessed tens of women who played roles recorded in history as either positive or negative ones. However, it was proved that making up roles and imposing them– even by soft power and in a stealthy way –cannot guarantee the targeted status even if otherwise appeared.

In contemporary and modern Egypt, meaning since the time of Bonaparte’s campaign on Egypt or “The French Campaign” prior to the end of the eighteenth century until now, Egypt witnessed women of the two kinds we mentioned. When the Family of Muhammed Ali Pasha became well-established in their rule of Egypt and hence an Egyptian royal family existed, the social role of the one bearing the title of queen or those having the titles of princesses came to light. Therefore, titles and decorations for women in specific were awarded like “Her majesty the queen”, “Her majesty the queen mother”– such title was given to the king’s mother who was a queen before –“Her highness the princesses” and also “Lady of high social standing”; the title granted to the woman awarded the decoration of perfection. Um Kulthoum was awarded this decoration and hence she had that title after King Farouq had attended a party for her in which she sang a song and mentioned his name “my king” in it.

On the other side, there were popular leading women like Safiyya Zaghloul; wife of Sa’ad Zaghloul, Hoda Sha’rawi and many others like Saiza Nabarawi. The Egyptian people came up with other titles parallel to the official ones, and so we had “Star of the Orient” given to Um Kulthoum, “Queen of Singing”, “Lady of the Arabic Cinema Screen” in addition to other titles. That was until the July 23, 1952 revolution erupted and the Royal era came to an end. As a result, there was no queen, no highnesses and no ladies of high social standing; however, the decoration of perfection along with other decorations and medals remained to be awarded for both women and men.

Turning into a republic, all people were equal and titles were cancelled. Work and national affiliation were the two standards defining worthiness of people, men and women. The door opened for popular classes of the middle and poor ones to join. The big move was when the Egyptian women gained the right of voting and running parliamentary elections. Then we had the first Egyptian female minister Dr. Hekmat Abu Zaid. Afterwards, Egypt had many female journalists and prestigious academic scientists in all fields.

With July revolution, especially when Gamal Abdel-Nasser assumed the office of presidency, this era of titles came to an end and almost all forms of pomp that used to appear in every social party attended by “their highness the princesses” and “Ladies of high social standing” disappeared where they used to show off their jewelry crowned with the most precious gemstones and designed by the most famous and prestigious Luxury jewelers known worldwide along with fortune-worth fur coats in addition to many other things. Those parties of so-called charity works, Lions and Rotary clubs were the big sign having all this beneath.

With revolution and republic declared, slogans like “We’re all masters” and “We’re all workers” starting from the president and reaching to the simple peasant were coined. With whole classes climbing the social ladder from poverty level and others declining, the titles were cancelled as I said before and those “auctions” of showing off wealth of jewelry, fur coats and latest fashion disappeared. Most importantly and above all this, there was no heiress to “Her majesty the queen” as Nasser, the Arab Egyptian man from Upper Egypt burdened with his country’s problems, rejected all those forms of pomp and luxury, and so he kept all the traditions and habits governing his life when he was still a lieutenant colonel young officer after he had become president; he kept his barber, tailor and also style of food and clothes.

Meanwhile, his wife, a daughter of a well-off family trading in carpets, looked like her peers of the middle class. In the same time, she had the same qualities for which the Egyptians revered her like Isis, Mary the Virgin and Um Hashem, as Tahiyya Kazem knew what it means to sacrifice the security and stability of her family since she knew, in a way or another, that her husband was heading a secret group in the army to overthrow the royal ruling regime. She also knew how to share responsibility with her husband regarding his tough working conditions when he headed for the battle field in Palestine during the 1948 war. If anyone read the correspondence between them during that time, he would have known the sacrifice this woman made.

She kept the same conduct even when her husband became a leader, not only for Egypt but for the whole Arab and third worlds. She maintained the same limits defining her role as the mother and wife supporting her husband and keeping his secrets. She also lived in the same standard as most Egyptians had, since the president and leader husband, in case of noticing any deviation from their normal standard of living, he used to ask immediately: “Can the rest of the Egyptians do this or afford this?”

With sacrifice, patience and ability to give unlimitedly, Tahiyya Kazem was able to win the people’s hearts. They kept venerating her to the extent that they gave her the title of “The Honorable Lady” who kept wearing mourning black dresses after her husband had died… how dramatic things changed after he left.

Those who witnessed the start of those changes tell an account saying that the wife of the new president Anwar Sadat invited the wives of the big officials to dinner after forty days had passed since Nasser died. Those invited were dressed with no sign of pomp or provoking jewelry, like they used to do when Nasser was alive, then the lady of the house laughed and said loudly to everyone: “what is this that you’re wearing?... where are the fancy clothes and jewelry?... get them out… the one you were afraid of is dead now”!

In fact, president Sadat loved pomp for he transformed the official residence of the presidency to Abdin palace and preferred to live in a luxurious villa looking over the Nile. He also liked to wear very elegant clothes, whether in the civil costumes like suits or the military uniform, as he’s the one who decided to wear a military uniform more close to the famous Nazi-style ones. He also allowed photographers to capture photos of him while he’s shaving his beard and dressed in underwear or in training suits.

That was like a clear permission for his wife to set off in her role. It also happened that the Egyptian people were shocked when president Sadat let a foreigner– a president of another state –drop a kiss on his wife’s face or when he let one of his daughters dress in a shoulderless clothes in front of foreigners in an official ceremony whose most important attendee was Menachem Begin. When Hussein al-Tohami, then councilor of the president, tried to cover her shoulders, the president rebuked him saying: “let her alone, Hussein.”

In such environment, there was an insistence to replace the title of “Her majesty the queen” with “Egypt First Lady”. Parties raising signs of so-called charity and social activities began to take place and women competed to get close to the powerful lady whose influence extended to giving, banning, ending and renewing the services of minister-ranked big officials. However, that made the president’s family a target for his enemies both abroad and on the domestic level, as many who disagreed with Sadat’s policies and stances made use of such thing to criticize and attack him and also target his wife. An example of this is what Muammar Gaddafi said about the president’s wife, the thing that severed the relations and waged war between the two countries. However, the worst is what people said in the slogans they chanted amid the uprising of Jan. 1977 as very obscene words were used.

Jehan Sadat, who has a grandmother from Malta, was the first one to start such thing of “Egypt First Lady” which later changed to “The First Lady” in the time of Hosni Mubarak. Here the phenomenon became even more complicated as the new First Lady “Suzan Thabet”, who has an English mother, had what Jehan Sadat didn’t have, as she’s more cultured– although Jehan Sadat had a doctorate degree in literature from Cairo University –and stricter in dealing with the ministers and presidency staff starting from the chief of staff and going down. It even happened that Suzan Thabet interfered in a presidential matter in public in front of TV cameras and asked the president to hold the Egyptian flag and wave it in a football match when Field-Marshal Tantawi, then-Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, said to her: “No… we’re the ones who hold the flag and salute Mr. President… not him.”

Although, there were positive sides for the activities of Jehan Ra’ouf or Jehan Sadat and Suzan Thabet like the two projects of “Al-Wafaa w Al-Amal” and “Reading for all”, those positive things were associated with authoritarianism and exceeding their limits. The Egyptians didn’t forget this and we all know how the Egyptians regard both of them after falling from power.

Tahiyya Kazem was a supportive wife for her husband when he was heading the Free Officer’s secret group and during the time of the revolution. Jehan Ra’ouf, meantime, did not hide that she said to her husband when he was asked to participate in the July, 1952 revolution: “If you got jailed, I will not ask about you”. It looks like he knew this already, so he went to the movies in the night of revolution to prove that he was there in case the revolution was crushed.

Moreover, those who saw what happened after Jan. 25, 2011 in the presidential palace said that Suzan Thabet was the most obstinate one refusing to let her husband step down even if the whole Egyptian people were slaughtered. Before this, she didn’t help her family limit their hunger for power as everyone knows she was the one behind that scheme of preparing her son to be the new president, as according to what some people said, she wanted to continue enjoying her authority even if her husband left presidency since her son would have been the new president, just like the case in the royal era; she wanted to be “Her majesty the queen mother” like Queen Nazli, mother of King Farouq, was called.

Now, I’d like to say that President Sisi’s wife is not and shall not be like her ex-counterparts whether Tahiyya Kazem, Jehan Ra’ouf or Suzan Thabet, for she should be what she is. Also, she should make her choices in light of her culture and awareness of her own human circumstances within her family and what surrounds it provided that, first, she chooses well the ones to counsel and who can help her define her role. Second, she should be aware enough of the history of ruling and presidency in Egypt. I guess she would be surprised of the events and conflicts that took place in the royal and presidential palaces either in public or in the shadows.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar




This article was published in Hawaa magazine in February 4, 2017.

To see the original article, go to:


#Hawaa_magazine #ahmed_elgammal #Egypt #president’s_wife

Thursday, 2 February 2017

Doubting everything




Mubarak’s regime has succeeded in creating deep distrust between the people and the regime starting from the republic president and reaching down to the lowest employee. Any statement or action issued or done by an official is regarded wrong even if it was proved to be right… Rumor became more credible than information… and doubt became stronger than certainty.

A young man stood to tell the president about the sewerage system and garbage in Aswan and the president in turn listened to him and moved immediately to see the problem on reality. Then some said: it’s a pre-set scenario and a poorly-acted play.

A humble woman called out for the president while he was in his car and his procession going. He heard her and ordered the car to stop to see the woman. The situation affected us very much and brought tears to our eyes. The woman talked about the warnings she received from the security that she may get shot dead if she went near the presidential procession. The president kept calming her down and brought her some water to drink for he realized she must have been either thirsty or even sick after what she has been through. As if he wanted to tell her: “calm down… don’t be afraid”. However, again they said it is a pre-prepared scenario. You can add so many similar situations, in which the president is involved, to this one.

Maybe the root for this phenomenon goes back to January, 1977 when some voices used to welcome making peace with the Zionist state claiming that putting an end to the wars will make our country richer… people will live in luxury… and even the monorail would be seen flying in the sky! It was even said that those who would not become rich in the time of Sadat would never be rich. Suddenly, the decisions to raise the prices were issued and the big uprising of January 18 and 19 took place.

However, the origin of this phenomenon has absolutely become stronger in Mubarak’s era. At that time, some said that the rule upon which the regime is based has more than one part. First one is that the country is broken down into pieces due to corruption and injustice, and that our country is like the broken clay pot that will collapse if you tried to do anything to it… and in case a corrupt personality was disposed, it shall go to hell so that the other corrupts can stay safe where they are.

The second part was a message directed to people: “say whatever you want… shout out loud… criticize and attack the regime to the maximum limit… we, the regime, in turn, will do whatever we want… but don’t you ever think of going into the streets”… and indeed we used to write and shout while Mubarak, his son, wife and all his regime figures were doing all what they wanted.

Then we come to the third part of the rule; that is making use of the institutions’ conflicts with each other… or it is more correct to say conflicts between heads of those institutions. Such conflicts are considered normal and healthy in the countries with well-established institutions. However, they are considered abnormal when the heads of those institutions implement the rule “divide in order to rule”. Such malicious rule spread into the society and aimed at dismantling it, especially if it was supported by international and regional powers that do not want Egypt to rise again.

The fourth part was depending on foreign international and regional powers to stay in power… meaning that as long as the Zionist state is satisfied, then the USA is satisfied as well, since the first is the real gate – in Mubarak’s opinion – to the second.

In such manner, this phenomenon of distrust has affected the society. And despite the deep trust between the people and the army has never changed or wavered, there were some times when the trust between the people and police was shaken. Such thing required a lot of efforts to bring such trust back. Also, the people have delegated president Sisi at the time when he was a minister of defense. Later, this was reinforced in the presidential elections when he won by a sweeping majority. Such trust was consolidated one time after another like when the people responded to finance the New Suez Canal project. There were also other positive responses representing the trust between the people and the president like floating exchange rate and soaring prices.

Some may take this trust for granted but I believe nothing is guaranteed in such regard. I say this because of those who will never stop damaging this trust like those officials adopting Mubarak’s era rule. For example, that issue related to Parliament’s cars and not executing the verdict issued by the court of cassation to enact Dr. Amr el-Shobaki’s membership in Parliament.

We need to support and reinforce trust and factors of Egyptian collective cohesion between the people and the regime lest they get affected by political, economic and social circumstances.

Translated into English by: Dalia Elnaggar


This article was published in Al Ahram newspaper on February 2, 2017.

To see the original article, go to:


#alahram #ahmed_elgammal #Egypt #Sisi #trust